Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen limitation did not change shoot phenolic content.

A claim from Organ‐specific responses of tomato growth and phenolic metabolism to nitrate limitation · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen limitation did not change shoot phenolic content.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Nitrogen limitatione0
Outcome
phenolic contente0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen limitation did not change the phenolic content in shoots, whereas it stimulated accumulation in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–912
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34

Title

Organ‐specific responses of tomato growth and phenolic metabolism to nitrate limitation

R. Larbat; J. Le Bot; F. Bourgaud; et al. Plant Biology 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00564.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ef166b220ad01cb277370fa71a802976b8b111c9740907b7b2b80aac6d7249e6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.