Claim · model-written summary
The review reports SWP uses 15% less water than AWD.
Oryza sativaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SWP results in 15% less water use than AWD”
t0“Rice”
Title
Enhancing Rice Productivity through Sustainable Water Management Practices
Gurkaran Singh; Harshpreet; Munish Kaundal Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2025. doi:10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i73587
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect The review reports periodic flooding can reduce water use by up to 45%.
- Intervention effect The review reports AWD can reduce water use by 7% to 33%.
- Intervention effect The review reports intermittent flooding saves 45% of water.
- Intervention effect The review reports intermittent irrigation reduces irrigation water use by 22%–76%.
- Intervention effect The review reports intermittent irrigation reduces runoff by 56%.
- Intervention effect The review reports saturation irrigation saves 27% of water.
- Recommendation The authors recommend knowledge, incentives and supportive policies for wider adoption of rice water saving measures.