Claim · model-written summary
Containers No.1 and No.2 were unsuitable for Ficus concinna seedlings.
- Taxon
- F.concinna var.subsessilisFicus concinnae0
- Treatment
- Containers No.1 and No.2e0
- Outcome
- not qualified to cultivate seedlingse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Containers No.1 and No.2 were not qualified to cultivate seedlings of F.concinna var.subsessilis.”
Title
Effects of Different Containers on the Growth of Seedlings of 3 Tree Species
MA Lv-yi Xibei Linxueyuan xuebao 2009
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Container differences in height and basal diameter were insignificant at the initial seedling growth stage.
- Intervention effect Schima superba seedling height and basal diameter differed significantly among containers after 75 days.
- Intervention effect Ficus concinna seedling growth differed among containers after an unclear number of days.
- Intervention effect Pinus pinaster seedling growth differed among containers after 135 days.
- Observation Containers No.1 and No.2 were suitable for class II Schima superba seedlings.