Paper · 2009 · Xibei Linxueyuan xuebao

Effects of Different Containers on the Growth of Seedlings of 3 Tree Species

MA Lv-yi

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of 7 different containers on the growth of the seedlings of 3 tree species were studied: Schima superba,Ficus concinna var.subsessilis and Pinus pinaster.The results indicated that no insignificant differences were found height and basal diameter at the initial growing stage within the same tree seedlings.But significant differences appeared after the growing stage with different time.The height and basal diameter of the seedlings of S.superba were significantly different in different containers after 75 days.after to day for F.concinna var.subsessilis,after 135 days for P.pinaster.Containers No.1 and No.2 were not qualified to cultivate seedlings of F.concinna var.subsessilis.Container No.1 and No.2 were suitable for cultivating S.superba with the level of classⅡ.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Container differences in height and basal diameter were insignificant at the initial seedling growth stage.

Taxon
tree seedlingse0
Organ / stage
initial growing stagee0
Outcome
height and basal diametere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that no insignificant differences were found height and basal diameter at the initial growing stage within the same tree seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Schima superba seedling height and basal diameter differed significantly among containers after 75 days.

Taxon
S.superbaSchima superbae0
Treatment
different containerse0
Outcome
height and basal diametere0
Qualifier
after 75 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The height and basal diameter of the seedlings of S.superba were significantly different in different containers after 75 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus concinna seedling growth differed among containers after an unclear number of days.

Taxon
F.concinna var.subsessilisFicus concinnae0
Qualifier
after to daye0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“after to day for F.concinna var.subsessilis,after 135 days for P.pinaster.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus pinaster seedling growth differed among containers after 135 days.

Taxon
P.pinasterPinus pinastere0
Qualifier
after 135 dayse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus pinaster
Pinus pinaster · Taxonjacilluch · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after to day for F.concinna var.subsessilis,after 135 days for P.pinaster.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Containers No.1 and No.2 were unsuitable for Ficus concinna seedlings.

Taxon
F.concinna var.subsessilisFicus concinnae0
Treatment
Containers No.1 and No.2e0
Outcome
not qualified to cultivate seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0

“Containers No.1 and No.2 were not qualified to cultivate seedlings of F.concinna var.subsessilis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Containers No.1 and No.2 were suitable for class II Schima superba seedlings.

Taxon
S.superbaSchima superbae0
Treatment
Container No.1 and No.2e0
Outcome
suitable for cultivatinge0
Qualifier
classⅡe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Container No.1 and No.2 were suitable for cultivating S.superba with the level of classⅡ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–783 · show in text ↑