Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Gypsum applied at 4.4 Mg ha −1 significantly decreased corn yields at the Northwest site in 2017 and the Wooster site in 2016.

A claim from Effects of Gypsum Application Rate and Frequency on Corn Response to Nitrogen · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum applied at 4.4 Mg ha −1 significantly decreased corn yields at the Northwest site in 2017 and the Wooster site in 2016.

Treatment
Gypsum applied at 4.4 Mg ha −1e4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
the Northwest site in 2017 and at the Wooster site in 2016e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in corn ( Zea Mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–478
e4

“Gypsum applied at 4.4 Mg ha −1 significantly decreased yields at the Northwest site in 2017 and at the Wooster site in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1412

Title

Effects of Gypsum Application Rate and Frequency on Corn Response to Nitrogen

Vijayasatya N. Chaganti; Steve W. Culman; Warren A. Dick; et al. Agronomy Journal 2019. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.10.0683

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-efc08adbc8190845f891c754d584e2afd60ebe1d5a41baf6def0edfbfb1f45cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.