Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 1000 ml/ha, tikka PDI was 10.85 in 2014–15.

A claim from Evaluation of Azoxystrobin 7.5% and Propiconazole 12.5% SE against Foliar Diseases in Groundnut · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1000 ml/ha, tikka PDI was 10.85 in 2014–15.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Azoxystrobin 7.5% + Propiconazole 12.5% SE @ 1000 ml/hae0
Outcome
PDI of tikka diseasee0
Value
10.85 PDIe0
Qualifier
Rabi 2014-15e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During Rabi 2014-15, the treatment Azoxystrobin 7.5% + Propiconazole 12.5% SE @ 1000 ml/ha recorded 8.56 PDI of rust disease and 10.85 PDI of tikka disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–660
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95

Title

Evaluation of Azoxystrobin 7.5% and Propiconazole 12.5% SE against Foliar Diseases in Groundnut

S. B. Gowdar; Sujay Hurali; Shyamrao Kulkarni Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 2024. doi:10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i51932

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-efdd59d307b4fba098e847bfc1a4263e24e8d81490644b8fbd9c4b40718c9ce6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

propiconazole · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.