Claim · model-written summary
Sodium silicate had no significant effect on sugarcane growth or sugar accumulation.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Sodium silicatee0
- Outcome
- growth or sugar accumulatione0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
- Value
- up to 200 ppme0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sugarcane to Foliar Treatment with Gibberellin”
e0“Sodium silicate (at up to 200 ppm) had no significant effect on growth or sugar accumulation and did not modify the response to GA”
Title
R. A. Yates Agronomy Journal 1972. doi:10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400010011x
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Single foliar gibberellic acid applications stimulated sugarcane stem elongation for 2 to 6 weeks.
- Intervention effect The gibberellin response was not reflected in higher cane yields unless plants were harvested within 6 weeks of treatment.
- Intervention effect A second gibberellin application at 4 weeks prolonged the sugarcane growth response.
- Association In the field, low temperatures were associated with more prolonged sugarcane growth responses.
- Association In the field, low temperatures were associated with smaller amplitude of sugarcane growth responses.
- Intervention effect Moisture stress had no apparent effect on the sugarcane gibberellin response.
- Association In greenhouse trials, environmental conditions and application rates showed no correlation with the duration of growth responses.
- Association In greenhouse trials, the amplitude of sugarcane growth responses increased with application rate within 25 to 200 ppm.
- Observation Three to five immature or semimature internodes of sugarcane were affected.
- Observation In field trials under warm conditions, a period of sugarcane growth retardation followed the initial gibberellin-induced stimulation, which did not occur in greenhouse trials.
- Observation Stem sugar concentrations of sugarcane fell during the growth-stimulation phase.
- Observation Stem sugar concentrations of sugarcane recovered as growth rates reduced.
- Intervention effect Dalapon slightly curtailed the duration of the sugarcane gibberellin response.
- Intervention effect Dalapon suppressed sugarcane growth after the gibberellin response.
- Intervention effect Dalapon increased stem sugar concentration of sugarcane in greenhouse trials but not in field trials.
- Intervention effect Sodium silicate did not modify the sugarcane response to gibberellin.
- Intervention effect Azauracil strongly inhibited sugarcane cane growth.
- Intervention effect Azauracil increased stem sugar concentrations of sugarcane.
- Intervention effect Azauracil showed no significant interaction with gibberellin in sugarcane.