Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Salt-tolerant JD19 and LH3 had less root growth inhibition than LD2 under 100 mM NaCl.

A claim from Integrated Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Metabolomic Analyses Revealed Molecular Mechanism for Salt Resistance in Soybean Roots · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-tolerant JD19 and LH3 had less root growth inhibition than LD2 under 100 mM NaCl.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
JD19 and LH3e0
Treatment
100 mM NaCl treatmente0
Outcome
root growth inhibitione0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
LD2e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Physiological studies showed that salt-tolerant cultivars JD19 and LH3 had less root growth inhibition, higher antioxidant enzyme activities, lower ROS accumulation, and lower Na+ and Cl- contents than salt-susceptible cultivar LD2 under 100 mM NaCl treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–560
t0

“soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–86

Title

Integrated Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Metabolomic Analyses Revealed Molecular Mechanism for Salt Resistance in Soybean Roots

Jie Jin; Jianfeng Wang; Keke Li; et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021. doi:10.3390/ijms222312848

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-f0aa1c952b1d5795b15ca823c42a4fe33832c7afbc2042b6ae1a2919aa3bcece · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sodium chloride · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.