Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Solarization maintained germination percentage at 90.67.

A claim from Effect of Solarization against Bruchid Infestation and Seed Quality in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) During Storage · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization maintained germination percentage at 90.67.

Taxon
Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
Solarization of fresh seeds in clear polyethylene (700 gauge) packet for 4 h for 6 dayse0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
90.67e0
Qualifier
upto six months of storagee0
Comparator
untreated control (Fresh seeds)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solarization of fresh seeds in clear polyethylene (700 gauge) packet for 4 h for 6 days was able to maintain per cent insect infestation (0.49%) below permissible limit and maintained germination percentage (90.67) >IMSCS upto six months of storage as compared with 4.22 per cent seed damage and 83.33 per cent germination in untreated control (Fresh seeds).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1386
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107

Title

Effect of Solarization against Bruchid Infestation and Seed Quality in Greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) During Storage

A. Padmasri; K. Parimala; B. Rajeswari; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2022. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i121463

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-f26b22b5815a30460992fb0d167191968efc26c5ac55d54563d6bbad8162da90 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

solarization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.