Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that 1:1 harvesting reduces risk while maintaining yields and benefits.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Within-field water harvesting with a 1:1 crop: catchment ratio thus reduced risk by reducing investments in seed and animal draught power, whilst maintaining yields and net benefits”
t0“rain-fed land”
Title
D. J. Rees; Z. A. Qureshi; S. Mehmood; et al. The Journal of Agricultural Science 1991. doi:10.1017/s0021859600076188
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Catchment runoff increased water storage by 55% for 1:1 plots.
- Intervention effect Catchment runoff increased water storage by 43% for 2:1 plots.
- Intervention effect Water harvesting increased yield per cropped area.
- Intervention effect Across trials, 1:1 treatment yield was 95% of control yield.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced yields in 2:1 plots.
- Intervention effect Overall costs fell 18% with 1:1 water harvesting.
- Intervention effect Overall costs fell 31% with 2:1 water harvesting.
- Intervention effect Net benefits for 1:1 harvesting equalled or exceeded the control.
- Intervention effect Net benefits for 2:1 harvesting were 32% lower.