Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium and/or potassium significantly increased leaf Ca2+ and K+ content of faba bean.

A claim from Effect of Calcium and Potassium on Antioxidant System of Vicia faba L. Under Cadmium Stress · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium and/or potassium significantly increased leaf Ca2+ and K+ content of faba bean.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabae2
Organ / stage
leafe2
Treatment
Ca(2+) and/or K(+)e5
Outcome
content of Ca(2+), K(+)e5
Direction
significant improvemente5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in leaf of Vicia faba L. (cv. TARA) under Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–391
e5

“However, a significant improvement was observed in all growth traits and content of Ca(2+), K(+), Chl a, Chl b, Pro and activity of antioxidant enzymes catalase (CAT), POD and SOD in plants subjected to Ca(2+) and/or K(+)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1124

Title

Effect of Calcium and Potassium on Antioxidant System of Vicia faba L. Under Cadmium Stress

Manzer H. Siddiqui; Mohamed H. Al-Whaibi; Ahmed M. Sakran; et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2012. doi:10.3390/ijms13066604

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-f3028510241545d1fa534bef07e8642abca641b99f31d5390727415f9d3276fc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

calcium(2+) · molecular: metabolites · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.