Claim · model-written summary
Organic treatments had lower soil bulk density than inorganic and integrated treatments.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- organic treatmentse0
- Outcome
- bulk densitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- inorganic and integrated treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“organic treatments recorded lower bulk density and higher water holding capacity than inorganic and integrated treatments”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Title
Bhavana V N; Babalad H B; Shanwad U K; et al. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 2025. doi:10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i103086
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Bulk density and water holding capacity showed little significant difference across treatments.
- Intervention effect Organic treatments had higher soil water holding capacity than inorganic and integrated treatments.
- Intervention effect Organic pigeonpea with groundnut had soil organic carbon of 5.93 g kg-1, higher than inorganic practice.
- Intervention effect Organic pigeonpea with greengram had soil organic carbon of 5.84 g kg-1, higher than inorganic practice.
- Intervention effect Organic treatments had dehydrogenase activity of 37.77 TPF formed g-1day-1, higher than the inorganic value.
- Intervention effect Organic treatments had available nitrogen of 256 kg ha-1, higher than inorganic treatments.
- Intervention effect Organic treatments had available phosphorus of 37 kg ha-1, higher than inorganic treatments.
- Intervention effect Organic treatments had available sulphur of 23.30 kg ha-1, higher than inorganic treatments.
- Observation Pigeonpea with groundnut performed better than pigeonpea with soybean.
- Observation Pigeonpea with greengram performed better than pigeonpea with soybean.