Claim · model-written summary
The hybrids did not significantly differ in NUE at high nitrogen.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference in yield and NUE between the two maize hybrids at the HN level.”
t0“maize”
Title
Xiang Li; Lin Piao; Wenhao Duan; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15051159
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Nitrogen input significantly increased grain yield.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen input significantly reduced nitrogen-use efficiency.
- Observation The hybrids did not significantly differ in yield at high nitrogen.
- Observation At low nitrogen ZD958 had 16.2% higher grain yield than T391.
- Observation At low nitrogen ZD958 had 15.6% higher NUE than T391.
- Observation ZD958 had 5.0% greater pre-silking dry matter than T391.
- Observation ZD958 had 7.9% greater post-silking dry matter than T391.
- Observation ZD958 had 11.6% greater pre-silking nitrogen accumulation.
- Observation ZD958 had 32.7% greater post-silking nitrogen accumulation.
- Observation ZD958 reallocated 45.6% more dry matter than T391.
- Observation ZD958 reallocated 17.5% more nitrogen than T391.
- Observation ZD958 grain nitrogen needed 15.5–38.1% remobilization from vegetative organs.
- Observation T391 grain nitrogen needed 17.2–46.7% remobilization from vegetative organs.
- Observation More grain nitrogen came from stem than leaves.
- Observation Middle leaves and lower stems tended to reallocate more nitrogen to grain.
- Association Lower stem nitrogen reallocation was significantly related to grain yield.
- Recommendation The authors propose high dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization as breeding traits under low nitrogen.