Claim · model-written summary
Panoctine gave poor crow damage control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- panoctinee0
- Interactor
- crowe0herbivore
- Outcome
- poor control of crow damagee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The commonly used fungicide product panoctine gave poor control of crow damage”
t0“wheat”
Title
An investigation of seed treatments for the control of crow damage to newly-sown wheat
T. F. Kennedy; J. Connery T-Stór (Teagasc) 2008
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Severe crow damage occurred.
- Observation Crow damage reduced untreated spring wheat populations by 59%, 72%, and 89% in 2004, 2005, and 2006.
- Observation Crow damage reduced winter wheat populations by 97%, 89%, and 96% in 2004, 2005, and 2006.
- Intervention effect Thiram gave the best control of crow damage.
- Intervention effect Higher Thiram rate increased spring wheat plant density by 42 to 70% versus untreated seed.
- Intervention effect Higher Thiram rate increased winter wheat plant density by 36 to 57% versus untreated seed.
- Intervention effect Anchor gave reasonably good crow damage control.
- Intervention effect Other investigated treatments did not control crow damage.
- Intervention effect Sowing deeper than 4.6 cm significantly reduced damage to treated and untreated wheat seed.