Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur changed proline content by 20.4% and 11.2% at 100% and 120% irrigation.

A claim from Ameliorate salinity effect through sulphur application and its effect on some soil and plant characters under different water quantities · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur changed proline content by 20.4% and 11.2% at 100% and 120% irrigation.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
20.4% and 11.2%e0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S improved proline content by about 20.4% and 11.2% relative to the control treatments under 100% and 120% irrigation treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2831–2973
e1

“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–515

Title

Ameliorate salinity effect through sulphur application and its effect on some soil and plant characters under different water quantities

Magdi Abdelhamid; Ebtisam Eldardiry; Mohamed Abd El-Hady Agricultural Sciences 2013. doi:10.4236/as.2013.41007

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-f457d7d217f1f90985578e54ef26adb0d5ce46b2fe1d2eef960900483f8d30a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 20 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · physiology: osmolytes · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.