Observationmodel-written summary

Wheat grown in the two cultivation environments did not differ in response to high CO2.

A claim from Very High CO2Reduces Photosynthesis, Dark Respiration and Yield in Wheat · 1997

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grown in the two cultivation environments did not differ in response to high CO2.

Outcome
response to high [CO2]e0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
soilless media in a glasshousee0
Setting
growth chamberse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences in the response to high [CO2] between wheat grown hydroponically in growth chambers under fluorescent lights and those grown in soilless media in a glasshouse under sunlight and high pressure sodium lamps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1502

Title

Very High CO2Reduces Photosynthesis, Dark Respiration and Yield in Wheat

J REUVENI Annals of Botany 1997. doi:10.1006/anbo.1997.0489

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-f4c20c1d0175497e02a1b22827eee0e333d585d25004efce8395b9cb70f7ee2f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer