Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat yields were not significantly affected by tillage.

A claim from Crop Production in a Wheat‐Cotton Doublecrop Rotation with Conservation Tillage · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yields were not significantly affected by tillage.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were not significantly affected by tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–687

Title

Crop Production in a Wheat‐Cotton Doublecrop Rotation with Conservation Tillage

P. G. Hunt; P. J. Bauer; T. A. Matheny jpa 1997. doi:10.2134/jpa1997.0462

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-f727149caf00b30f449c698495f4a8a3d043187751a082c1be339a6642b13bad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.