Claim · model-written summary
The R-M rotation had 66% higher protein yield than the R-R rotation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae3 - Treatment
- R-M rotatione6
- Outcome
- proteine6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 66%e6
- Comparator
- R-R rotatione6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Systems rice equivalent yield (SREY) and systems calorie and protein yields were about 5%, 3% and 6%, respectively, higher under CA than CT”
e6“The R-M rotation had higher SREY, calorie, protein yields, and GM by 24%, 26%, 66%, and 148%, respectively, than the predominantly practiced R-R rotation”
Title
Muhammad Arshadul Hoque; Mahesh K. Gathala; Jagadish Timsina; et al. Field Crops Research 2022. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108791
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Over three years, monsoon rice yield was 8% lower under conservation agriculture than under conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Average winter crops yield was 13% higher under conservation agriculture than under conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Systems rice equivalent yield (SREY) was about 5% higher under CA than CT.
- Intervention effect Systems calorie yield was about 3% higher under CA than CT.
- Intervention effect Systems protein yield was about 6% higher under CA than CT.
- Intervention effect Alternating tillage added approximately 1% more to the SREY, calorie and protein benefits compared with conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Gross margin was 16% higher under CA and AT than under CT.
- Intervention effect Labor and total production cost were reduced under CA compared with CT.
- Intervention effect The R-M rotation had 24% higher SREY than the predominantly practiced R-R rotation.
- Intervention effect The R-M rotation had 26% higher calorie yield than the R-R rotation.
- Intervention effect The R-M rotation had 148% higher gross margin than the R-R rotation.
- Intervention effect The R-W-MB rotation had the highest SREY, 30%.
- Intervention effect The R-W-MB rotation had the second highest gross margin, 118% higher.
- Intervention effect Under combined tillage and cropping system, CA with R-M rotation showed superior SREY, protein yield and gross margin.
- Observation Labor use and gross margin across rotations were grouped into four categories.
- Recommendation The authors recommend partial and full CA-based tillage with appropriate crop diversification for multiple benefits in rice-based rotations.