Claim · model-written summary
Combined panicle urea and RBB was better in transplanted fields.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Outcome
- combined panicle urea and RBB was better in seedling‐transplanted fieldse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the combined panicle urea and RBB was better in seedling‐transplanted fields, while a single basal application with RBB was better in direct‐seeded rice.”
t0“Rice”
Title
Pengfu Hou; Lixiang Xue; Lixiang Xue; et al. Agronomy Journal 2019. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.03.0192
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect SCU did not improve yield compared with CONV in either planting mode.
- Intervention effect RBB increased yield more than SCU under both planting modes.
- Association Planting mode and fertilizer treatment interacted significantly for yield.
- Intervention effect RBB BP had the highest transplanted-field yield in 2013, reaching 12.04 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect RBB BP had the highest transplanted-field yield in 2014, reaching 13.44 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect RBB basal had the highest direct-seeded yield, with no significant treatment difference.
- Intervention effect RBB basal increased NUE in transplanted and direct-seeded fields.
- Intervention effect RBB BP increased NUE in transplanted and direct-seeded fields.
- Intervention effect SCU BP increased NUE in transplanted and direct-seeded fields.
- Intervention effect RBB basal had the highest NUE in direct-seeded rice in 2013.
- Intervention effect RBB BP otherwise had the highest NUE across planting modes and years.
- Recommendation A single basal RBB application was better in direct-seeded rice.