Mechanismmodel-written summary

In highly compacted soil, none of the four VAM fungi produced an observable mycorrhizal growth response; authors attributed this to oxygen decline, pore changes and possible ethylene production.

A claim from Effects of soil compaction on phosphorus uptake and growth of Trifolium subterraneum colonized by four species of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi · 1998

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In highly compacted soil, none of the four VAM fungi produced an observable mycorrhizal growth response; authors attributed this to oxygen decline, pore changes and possible ethylene production.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
highly compacted soile0
Outcome
mycorrhizal growth responsee0
Direction
absencee0
Qualifier
significant decrease in the O 2 content of the soil atmosphere, change in soil pore size distribution and, presumably, to ethylene productione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absence of any observable mycorrhizal growth response to any of the four species of VAM fungi in highly compacted soil (bulk density = 1·75 Mg m −3 ) was attributed to the significant decrease in the O 2 content of the soil atmosphere, change in soil pore size distribution and, presumably, to ethylene production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1766
t0

“Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–84

Title

Effects of soil compaction on phosphorus uptake and growth of Trifolium subterraneum colonized by four species of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

H. NADIAN; S. E. SMITH; A. M. ALSTON; et al. New Phytologist 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00219.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-fa48e6f6ccb78ca850f07492d74c610c884b9ac01baa1d6b2322494b8939d031 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer