Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fusarium incidence was significantly higher in non-grafted than grafted watermelon.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF ROOTSTOCKS ON Fusarium WILT, NEMATODE INFESTATION, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN WATERMELON PRODUCTION · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium incidence was significantly higher in non-grafted than grafted watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveume0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
non-graftede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum was significantly greater in the non-grafted than in the grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1024
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101

Title

INFLUENCE OF ROOTSTOCKS ON Fusarium WILT, NEMATODE INFESTATION, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN WATERMELON PRODUCTION

Juan Carlos Álvarez-Hernández; Javier Zaragoza Castellanos-Ramos; César Leobardo Aguirre-Mancilla; et al. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2015. doi:10.1590/s1413-70542015000400002

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-fb40e5f95ee8f4291490ab30be0054909c522a7c03d004d68e8970edbeb98bc2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

grafting · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.