Claim · model-written summary
Counter 15G (both formulations) gave a greater stand count than Temik 15G or check plots.
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- Counter 15G (both formulations)e2
- Interactor
- southern corn billbuge1pest
- Outcome
- stand counte2
- Direction
- greatere2
- Comparator
- Temik 15G or check plotse2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Postemergence Billbug Control in Field Corn, 1979”
e1“Four granular insecticides were tested to determine their potential for controlling the southern corn billbug as a postemergence application in a sandy loam soil”
e2“Counter 15G (both formulations) and Lorsban 15G plots contained more undamaged and less severely damaged plants plus a greater stand count than Temik 15G or check plots”
Title
Postemergence Billbug Control in Field Corn, 1979
T. N. Hunt Insecticide and Acaricide Tests 1980. doi:10.1093/iat/5.1.128
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Counter 15G (both formulations) gave more undamaged plants than Temik 15G or check plots against the southern corn billbug.
- Intervention effect Lorsban 15G gave more undamaged plants than Temik 15G or check plots against the southern corn billbug.
- Intervention effect Lorsban 15G gave a greater stand count than Temik 15G or check plots.
- Observation Yields in field corn were generally low, attributed to the poor initial stand.
- Observation Insecticide treatments differed significantly in damage rating and yield at the .05 level.