Claim · model-written summary
Goodeve had longer farinograph dough development time than check mean.
- Taxon
- Goodevet0
- Outcome
- farinograph dough development timee0
- Direction
- longere0
- Comparator
- mean of the checkse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“longer farinograph dough development time and higher farinograph water absorption than the mean of the checks”
t0“Goodeve”
Title
R. M. DePauw; R. E. Knox; J. B. Thomas; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2009. doi:10.4141/cjps09194
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Observation Goodeve resisted orange blossom wheat midge via Sm1.
- Observation Goodeve had higher grain yield than all checks except Superb.
- Observation Goodeve matured earlier than AC Barrie, Laura and Superb.
- Observation Goodeve had shorter straw than Katepwa and Laura.
- Observation Goodeve lodged less than Katepwa and Laura.
- Observation Goodeve had an awnless spike and white chaff.
- Observation Goodeve had higher grain protein concentration than check mean.
- Observation Goodeve had brighter flour colour than check mean.
- Observation Goodeve had higher farinograph water absorption than check mean.
- Observation Goodeve met CWRS end-use specifications.
- Observation Goodeve resisted prevalent stem rust races.
- Observation Goodeve resisted loose smut.
- Observation Goodeve had moderate leaf rust resistance.
- Observation Goodeve had moderate common bunt susceptibility.
- Observation Goodeve was susceptible to fusarium head blight.