Paper · 2009 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Goodeve hard red spring wheat

R. M. DePauw; R. E. Knox; J. B. Thomas; et al.

16
claims
25
verbatim quotes
26
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

DePauw, R. M., Knox, R. E., Thomas, J. B., Smith, M., Clarke, J. M., Clarke, F. R., McCaig, T. N. and Fernandez, M. R. 2009. Goodeve hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 89: 937-944. Goodeve, hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) expressed resistance to the insect orange blossom wheat midge Sitodiplosis mosellana (Gehin) that was conferred by the Sm1 gene on chromosome 2BS and selected with the DNA marker WM1. Goodeve had significantly higher grain yield than all checks except Superb, was significantly earlier maturing than AC Barrie, Laura and Superb, had significantly shorter straw than Katepwa and Laura, and had significantly less lodging than Katepwa and Laura. Goodeve has an awnless spike with white chaff colour. Goodeve had higher grain protein concentration, brighter flour colour, longer farinograph dough development time and higher farinograph water absorption than the mean of the checks. Goodeve meets the end-use quality specifications of the Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat market class. Goodeve expressed resistance to prevalent races of stem rust and loose smut, moderate resistance to leaf rust, moderate susceptibility to common bunt and susceptibility to fusarium head blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve resisted orange blossom wheat midge via Sm1.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Goodevee0
Interactor
Sitodiplosis mosellanaSitodiplosis mosellanae0pest
Gene
Sm1e0
Outcome
resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitodiplosis mosellana
Sitodiplosis mosellana · InteractorGilles San Martin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve, hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) expressed resistance to the insect orange blossom wheat midge Sitodiplosis mosellana (Gehin) that was conferred by the Sm1 gene on chromosome 2BS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–387 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had higher grain yield than all checks except Superb.

Taxon
Goodevee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all checks except Superbe0

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve had significantly higher grain yield than all checks except Superb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve matured earlier than AC Barrie, Laura and Superb.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Outcome
maturinge0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
AC Barrie, Laura and Superbe0

Verbatim

e0

“was significantly earlier maturing than AC Barrie, Laura and Superb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had shorter straw than Katepwa and Laura.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
Katepwa and Laurae0

Verbatim

e0

“had significantly shorter straw than Katepwa and Laura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve lodged less than Katepwa and Laura.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
Katepwa and Laurae0

Verbatim

e0

“had significantly less lodging than Katepwa and Laura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had an awnless spike and white chaff.

Taxon
Goodevee0
Outcome
awnless spike with white chaff coloure0

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve has an awnless spike with white chaff colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–738 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had higher grain protein concentration than check mean.

Taxon
Goodevee0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mean of the checkse0

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve had higher grain protein concentration, brighter flour colour, longer farinograph dough development time and higher farinograph water absorption than the mean of the checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–920 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had brighter flour colour than check mean.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Outcome
flour coloure0
Direction
brightere0
Comparator
mean of the checkse0

Verbatim

e0

“brighter flour colour, longer farinograph dough development time and higher farinograph water absorption than the mean of the checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had longer farinograph dough development time than check mean.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Outcome
farinograph dough development timee0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
mean of the checkse0

Verbatim

e0

“longer farinograph dough development time and higher farinograph water absorption than the mean of the checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had higher farinograph water absorption than check mean.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Outcome
farinograph water absorptione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mean of the checkse0

Verbatim

e0

“higher farinograph water absorption than the mean of the checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve met CWRS end-use specifications.

Taxon
Goodevee0
Outcome
end-use quality specificationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve meets the end-use quality specifications of the Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat market class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve resisted prevalent stem rust races.

Taxon
Goodevee0
Interactor
stem ruste0pathogen
Outcome
resistancee0

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve expressed resistance to prevalent races of stem rust and loose smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve resisted loose smut.

Taxon
Goodevee0
Interactor
loose smute0pathogen
Outcome
resistancee0

Verbatim

e0

“Goodeve expressed resistance to prevalent races of stem rust and loose smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had moderate leaf rust resistance.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Interactor
leaf ruste0pathogen
Outcome
moderate resistancee0

Verbatim

e0

“moderate resistance to leaf rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve had moderate common bunt susceptibility.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Interactor
common bunte0pathogen
Outcome
moderate susceptibilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“moderate susceptibility to common bunt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodeve was susceptible to fusarium head blight.

Taxon
Goodevet0
Interactor
fusarium head blighte0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“susceptibility to fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Goodeve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑