Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Five manure treatments had higher physiological N use efficiency than mineral fertilizer and combined fertilizer.

A claim from Nitrogen use efficiency of poultry manure by maize · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five manure treatments had higher physiological N use efficiency than mineral fertilizer and combined fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Poultry manure rates of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 2 x 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
physiological N use efficienciese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mineral fertilizer rate of 60-40-40 kg NPK ha-1 and 2 t PM ha-1 + 30-20-20 kg NPK ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry manure rates of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 2 x 2 t ha-1 (i.e. split application) showed higher physiological N use efficiencies than the mineral fertilizer rate of 60-40-40 kg NPK ha-1 and 2 t PM ha-1 + 30-20-20 kg NPK ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–872
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50

Title

Nitrogen use efficiency of poultry manure by maize

S A Boateng; M Kornahrens; J Zickermann Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana) 2007. doi:10.4314/just.v27i2.33042

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-fe3423c4e637aae73b9c8bbc740434ffe4e253ab58b0003b3e469a87b2b3e039 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.