Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vermicompost produced 40.73 total root nodules per plant.

A claim from Effect of different organic manures on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost produced 40.73 total root nodules per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
total number of root nodulese0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
40.73 plant-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of vermicompost 2 t ha-1 recorded significantly tallest plant (54.70 cm), total number of root nodules (40.73 plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–454
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67

Title

Effect of different organic manures on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Jitendra Kumar Yadav; Mahendra Sharma; R.K. Yadav; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-fe8a11e370dd8d33e63b0b019b97261e469ca2cd0383f8aa5452a46a441b81bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    RP, PM and MN-54 raised nodule count by 43.6% versus controls.

    Improving Nutrient Uptake, Growth, Yield and Protein Content in Chickpea by the Co-Addition of Phosphorus Fertilizers, Organic Manures, and Bacillus sp. MN-54 · 2021 · compared with control treatments

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Treatment 5 produced maximum nodules/plant (46.20) than other treatments in chickpea.

    Influence of nutrient spray on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2024 · compared with other treatments

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    At 30 kg N/ha, fertilizer inhibited chickpea fixation and gave lower NID estimates than NAV.

    Seasonal variation in the suitability of different methods for estimating biological nitrogen fixation by grain legumes under rainfed conditions · 1996 · compared with NAV

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Close phosphate placement reduced nodule dry weight in sand.

    Triple superphosphate placement affects early growth of chickpea · 2010

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The three different 15N-labelled fertilizer applications did not affect estimates of N2 fixation in chickpea.

    N2-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA: EFFECT OF HYDROQUINONE AS A UREASE INHIBITOR ON THE STABILITY OF 15N ENRICHMENT · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Fertilizer treatments reduced nodule dry weight versus control, except super phosphate seed priming.

    Studying the Effect of Different Fertilizers Types and Methods of Application on Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Some Chickpea Varieties Under Rainfed Conditions · 2021 · compared with untreated (control treatment)

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments did not affect plant height, fresh root and leaf weight, or dry nodule weight in either period.

    EFFECT OF FERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON PLANT CHARACTERISTICS IN CHICKPEA VARIETIES IN PRE-FLOWERING AND FULL-FLOWERING PERIODS · 2021 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    At 1000 kg per hectare, RP-EC increased nodules per plant by 35.3% relative to control in the field.

    Application of rock phosphate enriched composts increases nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea · 2017 · compared with control

    Same direction

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.