Claim · model-written summary
No-till sorghum yielded 1.44 t/ha versus 1.51 t/ha with traditional cultivation; the authors reported no decrease.
- Treatment
- no-till technologye0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no decreasee0
- Value
- 1.44 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1.51 t/hae0
- Comparator
- traditional methodse0
SorghumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of sorghum cultivated with traditional methods was 1.51 t/ha and 1.44 t/ha in the case of no-till technology (the least significant difference (0.5) is 0.21 t/ha). That means there is no decrease in yield in terms of direct seeding”
Title
The cultivation of Sorghum Bicolor using no-till technology and a complex biological substance
T N Melnichuk; A M Izotov; E N Turin; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2019. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012084
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect A complex biological substance increased sorghum yield by 0.11 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Seed inoculation under no-till increased sorghum yield by 0.22 t/ha relative to classic technology.
- Intervention effect Under traditional cultivation, seed inoculation did not affect sorghum yield.
- Observation Sorghum ash fraction varied from 2.40% to 2.58% across variants without a positive increase.
- Intervention effect Traditional cultivation with microbial substance increased sorghum protein fraction by 1.34% relative to control.
- Intervention effect Traditional cultivation with microbial substance increased sorghum protein fraction by 1.66% relative to inoculated direct seeding.
- Observation Sorghum crude fat content ranged from 3.34% to 4.43%.
- Intervention effect No-till plus inoculation had 0.53% more sorghum crude fat than no-till without inoculation.
- Intervention effect Traditional seeding with or without inoculation reduced sorghum crude fat relative to direct seeding.