Claim · model-written summary
Flowering dates did not differ among varieties under short days.
- Taxon
- Adzukibean
Vigna angularise1 - Outcome
- flowering datee0
- Direction
- no differencee0
- Setting
- short-day plote0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The flowering date showed no difference at the short-day plot”
e1“Adzukibean varieties”
Title
Junro TASAKI Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1965. doi:10.1626/jcs.34.14
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Association Early Adzukibean varieties showed less sensitivity to short days than late varieties.
- Association The intermediate M 2 group had flowering dates that varied especially with temperature.
- Association Manchurian ecotypes were slightly more sensitive to short days than Hokkaido ecotypes.
- Observation Under stronger short days, temperature thresholds for flowering did not differ among varieties.
- Association Under long days, temperature thresholds for flowering increased with varietal lateness.
- Mechanism Differences in sensitivity to daylength appeared as differences in flowering delay under long days.
- Association Varietal earliness and daylength sensitivity had matching orders.
- Method / resource The summer-solstice long photoperiod and a 16h30m long-day plot were equally effective for assessing daylength sensitivity.
- Recommendation The authors propose earliness testing as a practical substitute for testing daylength sensitivity.