Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Raised bed sowing had the highest net return in 2012 and 2013.

A claim from Assessment of different methods of sowing of vegetable cowpea to harness productivity and profitability potential · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed sowing had the highest net return in 2012 and 2013.

Treatment
raised bed method of sowinge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
`98300 ha–1 and `95740 ha–1e0
Qualifier
during 2012 and 2013e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, highest net return `98300 ha–1 and `95740 ha–1 with highest B:C ratio 3.64 and 3.27 was also observed in raised bed method of sowing during 2012 and 2013, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–778
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–61

Title

Assessment of different methods of sowing of vegetable cowpea to harness productivity and profitability potential

Ashish K. Chaturvedi; Rakesh Pandey; R. P. Chaudhary; et al. Annals of Agricultural Research 2015

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ffb4ac519fc5e2a4a28d8e7613ee9d9ec1a68de1be749ac737f88b65a95c27eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    California cowpea under no-till suffered crop failure or yields below 20% of standard production.

    Conservation tillage for organic agriculture: Evolution toward hybrid systems in the western USA · 2012 · compared with standard production method

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Two and four pass compaction reduced nutrient uptake and grain yield of cowpea.

    Traffic‐induced compaction in maize, cowpea and soya bean production on a tropical alfisol after ploughing and no‐tillage: Crop growth · 1986

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    On cohesion-prone soils, conventional tillage reduced the possibility of a second cowpea harvest even with inoculation or N fertilizer.

    Soil Management and Efficiency of Rhizobia Strains of Cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in the Tropics · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Cowpea growth and yield on Anira peat were not significantly affected by tillage.

    A comparison of conventional tillage and no-tillage for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) production · 1985

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage had no significant effect on cowpea yield.

    TILLAGE, SEED BED CONFIGURATION AND MULCHING: EFFECTS ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES, AND RESPONSES OF CASSAVA, COWPEA AND MAIZE · 1979

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Tractor compaction reduced cowpea growth and yield parameters.

    Cowpea response to compaction and mulching on a sloping loamy sand soil in Southern Nigeria · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Conservation tillage methods had no significant effect on cowpea grain yield.

    Effects of Conservation Tillage, Phosphorus and Variety on Selected Soil Physical Properties and Cowpea Productivity at Minna in Nigeria’s Southern Guinea Savanna · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Cowpea yields did not differ significantly by tillage method.

    Effect of continued cropping on a heavy clay soil on the coast of Guyana with and without tillage. · 1992 · compared with tillage methods

    No difference from an alternative

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.