Paper · 2009 · Journal of Crop and Weed

Effect of phosphorus on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rainfed mulberry (Morus alba L.) and its economics in Chotanagpur plateau of Jharkhand.

P. C. Bose; Deepak P. Srivastava; Rup Kumar Kar; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Regional Sericultural Research Station, Ranchi, Jharkhand during 2001-2004 to study the effect of graded doses of phosphorus on mulberry (Morus alba L.). Graded doses of phosphate (0 to 60 kg P2O5 ha yr) along with recommended doses of nitrogen and potash were applied to a low–P sandy loam yellow-reddish coarse textured soil under rainfed condition. Analysis of three years’ pooled data revealed that the growth attributes, yield, nutrient uptake, net return and benefit : cost ratio were influenced significantly due to hosphate application up to 60 kg P2O5 ha yr.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate application significantly influenced growth attributes and yield.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
hosphate application up to 60 kg P2O5 ha yre0
Outcome
growth attributes, yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the growth attributes, yield, nutrient uptake, net return and benefit : cost ratio were influenced significantly due to hosphate application up to 60 kg P2O5 ha yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–77 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.