Paper · 2002 · 中国农业科学(英文版)

Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Content as Influenced by Sodium Bisulfite

Tian Ji-chun

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two wheat varieties with similar yield and significantly different protein content were chosen to study the effect of foliage spraying sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3) at low concentration to wheat plants receiving different levels of nitrogen on nitrate reduction along with yield and protein content of grain, so as to discuss the relationship between carbon metabolism and nitrogen metabolism, and find out the intrinsic mechanism of grain yield and protein content formation. The results showed that spraying NaHSO3 at grain-filing stage increased the yield of grain, but declined the capacity of nitrate reduction, which might result in decrease of protein content in the end. Whether receiving NaHSO, or not, the variety with high protein content had higher final protein level and nitrate reduction capacity than that with low protein content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHSO3 spraying at grain-filing stage increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
spraying NaHSO3 at grain-filing stagee0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying NaHSO3 at grain-filing stage increased the yield of grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHSO3 spraying at grain-filing stage reduced wheat nitrate reduction capacity.

Treatment
spraying NaHSO3 at grain-filing stagee0
Outcome
capacity of nitrate reductione0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying NaHSO3 at grain-filing stage increased the yield of grain, but declined the capacity of nitrate reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that reduced nitrate reduction from NaHSO3 spraying might decrease wheat grain protein content.

Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
capacity of nitrate reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“declined the capacity of nitrate reduction, which might result in decrease of protein content in the end”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-protein wheat variety had higher final protein than the low-protein variety regardless of NaHSO3 treatment.

Material
variety with high protein contente0
Outcome
final protein levele0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
that with low protein contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whether receiving NaHSO, or not, the variety with high protein content had higher final protein level and nitrate reduction capacity than that with low protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-protein wheat variety had higher nitrate reduction capacity than the low-protein variety regardless of NaHSO3 treatment.

Material
variety with high protein contente0
Outcome
nitrate reduction capacitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
that with low protein contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whether receiving NaHSO, or not, the variety with high protein content had higher final protein level and nitrate reduction capacity than that with low protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

sodium hydrogensulfite · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sodium hydrogensulfite · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.