Paper · 1999 · Photosynthetica

Effects of Drought on Photosynthetic Performance and Water Relations of Four Vigna Genotypes

P. Scotti Campos; J.C. Ramalho; J.A. Lauriano; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of drought on plant water relations and photosynthesis of Vigna glabrescens (Vg) and Vigna unguiculata (cvs. 1183, EPACE-1 and Lagoa), which differ in their drought resistance, was compared. With the increase of drought severity, Vg showed a more gradual stomatal closure and maintained significantly higher levels of stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic activity (PN) than the other genotypes even when minimum relative water content (RWC) values were observed. Furthermore, Vg was the only genotype able to accumulate significant amounts of proline already under moderate water deficit, what could explain the lower osmotic potential (ψs) values observed in these plants. The three V. unguiculata cultivars presented a similar stomatal control under increasing water deficit. A mesophyllic impairment of photosynthetic capacity (Pmax) was detected for cv. 1183 from the beginning of drought onset (85-75 % RWC) while in the Vg plants the values remained unaffected along the whole drought period, indicating that PN decrease observed in this genotype is mainly a consequence of stomatal closure. Such Pmax maintenance suggests the existence of a high mesophyllic ability to cope with increasing tissue dehydration in Vg.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna glabrescens had more gradual stomatal closure as drought intensified.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Material
Vge0
Treatment
drought severitye0
Outcome
stomatal closuree0
Direction
more graduale0

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of drought severity, Vg showed a more gradual stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna glabrescens maintained significantly higher stomatal conductance than other genotypes.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
minimum relative water content (RWC) valuese0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Verbatim

e0

“maintained significantly higher levels of stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic activity (PN) than the other genotypes even when minimum relative water content (RWC) values were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna glabrescens maintained significantly higher photosynthetic activity than other genotypes.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Verbatim

e0

“maintained significantly higher levels of stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic activity (PN) than the other genotypes even when minimum relative water content (RWC) values were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only Vigna glabrescens accumulated significant proline under moderate water deficit.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Material
Vge0
Outcome
amounts of prolinee0
Direction
accumulatee0
Qualifier
moderate water deficite0

Verbatim

e0

“Vg was the only genotype able to accumulate significant amounts of proline already under moderate water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna glabrescens had lower osmotic potential.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Outcome
osmotic potentiale0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

e0

“the lower osmotic potential (ψs) values observed in these plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three Vigna unguiculata cultivars had similar stomatal control under increasing water deficit.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Outcome
stomatal controle0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
increasing water deficite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three V. unguiculata cultivars presented a similar stomatal control under increasing water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–796 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar 1183 showed mesophyll photosynthetic capacity impairment from drought onset.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Material
cv. 1183e0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity (Pmax)e0
Direction
impairmente0
Qualifier
85-75 % RWCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mesophyllic impairment of photosynthetic capacity (Pmax) was detected for cv. 1183 from the beginning of drought onset (85-75 % RWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna glabrescens Pmax remained unaffected through the drought.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Material
Vge0
Outcome
valuese0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
whole drought periode0

Verbatim

e0

“in the Vg plants the values remained unaffected along the whole drought period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute Vigna glabrescens PN decline mainly to stomatal closure.

Taxon
Vigna glabrescensVigna glabrescenst0
Outcome
PN decreasee0
Qualifier
stomatal closuree0

Verbatim

e0

“PN decrease observed in this genotype is mainly a consequence of stomatal closure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna glabrescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–86 · show in text ↑