Paper · 2009 · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

Adventitious rooting in microcuttings of selected indigenous landscape trees of Malaysia.

Yahya Awang; Nor' Ain Abdul Rahman; Ab Kahar Sandrang

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rooting performance in microcuttings of five indigenous and one exotic landscape tree species was evaluated in a 60 days period. Rate of rooting varied greatly among species as Ilex cymosa, Tabebuia heterophylla and Agalaia korthalsii reached 100% rooting at 24, 42 and 48 days after insertion into the rooting medium followed by Lepisanthes rubiginosa and Hopea odorata species (95 & 80% rooting at 60 days, respectively). The poorest rooting ability (30% rooting at 60 days) was shown by Aporusa globifera and was first noticed at 30 days. Results of Ilex cymosa species for adventitious root induction per microcutting was markedly different from other species and it produced the highest number of adventitious roots (14.07 roots/microcutting). A. korthalsii generated the fewer, but the heaviest roots compared to I. cymosa. Rooting ability of microcuttings was highly correlated with its number of leaves produced during rooting (r = 0.869-0.981) as well as, with regenerative shoot length of the mother plants (r = 0.690-0.954). Regenerative leaf growth of mother plants and the rooting of their microcuttings was species-specific suggesting that developing association between the two parameters is difficult.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ilex cymosa reached 100% rooting by 24 days.

Taxon
Ilex cymosaIlex cymosae0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
24, 42 and 48 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ilex cymosa
Ilex cymosa · TaxonBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ilex cymosa, Tabebuia heterophylla and Agalaia korthalsii reached 100% rooting at 24, 42 and 48 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tabebuia heterophylla reached 100% rooting by 42 days.

Taxon
Tabebuia heterophyllaTabebuia heterophyllae0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tabebuia heterophylla
Tabebuia heterophylla · TaxonD. L. Laplace · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ilex cymosa, Tabebuia heterophylla and Agalaia korthalsii reached 100% rooting at 24, 42 and 48 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agalaia korthalsii reached 100% rooting by 48 days.

Taxon
Agalaia korthalsiie0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Ilex cymosa, Tabebuia heterophylla and Agalaia korthalsii reached 100% rooting at 24, 42 and 48 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lepisanthes rubiginosa reached 95% rooting at 60 days.

Taxon
Lepisanthes rubiginosaLepisanthes rubiginosae0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
95e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepisanthes rubiginosa
Lepisanthes rubiginosa · TaxonSi Gam · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lepisanthes rubiginosa and Hopea odorata species (95 & 80% rooting at 60 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hopea odorata reached 80% rooting at 60 days.

Taxon
Hopea odorataHopea odoratae0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hopea odorata
Hopea odorata · TaxonSilviculture at Vietnamese Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lepisanthes rubiginosa and Hopea odorata species (95 & 80% rooting at 60 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aporusa globifera had the poorest rooting, 30% at 60 days, first seen at 30 days.

Taxon
Aporusa globiferae0
Outcome
rooting abilitye0
Direction
pooreste0
Value
30%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The poorest rooting ability (30% rooting at 60 days) was shown by Aporusa globifera and was first noticed at 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ilex cymosa produced the highest adventitious root count, 14.07 per microcutting.

Taxon
Ilex cymosaIlex cymosae0
Outcome
number of adventitious rootse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.07 roots/microcuttinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ilex cymosa
Ilex cymosa · TaxonBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ilex cymosa species for adventitious root induction per microcutting was markedly different from other species and it produced the highest number of adventitious roots (14.07 roots/microcutting)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. korthalsii produced fewer roots than I. cymosa.

Taxon
A. korthalsiie0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
I. cymosae0

Verbatim

e0

“A. korthalsii generated the fewer, but the heaviest roots compared to I. cymosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. korthalsii roots were heavier than I. cymosa roots.

Taxon
A. korthalsiie0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
heavieste0
Comparator
I. cymosae0

Verbatim

e0

“A. korthalsii generated the fewer, but the heaviest roots compared to I. cymosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–828 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting ability correlated strongly with leaf number, r=0.869–0.981.

Taxon
landscape treest0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Rooting ability of microcuttingse0
Value
r = 0.869-0.981e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting ability of microcuttings was highly correlated with its number of leaves produced during rooting (r = 0.869-0.981)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“landscape trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting ability correlated with mother-plant shoot length, r=0.690–0.954.

Taxon
landscape treest0
Organ / stage
regenerative shoote0
Outcome
Rooting ability of microcuttingse0
Value
r = 0.690-0.954e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting ability of microcuttings was highly correlated with its number of leaves produced during rooting (r = 0.869-0.981) as well as, with regenerative shoot length of the mother plants (r = 0.690-0.954)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“landscape trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mother-plant regenerative leaf growth and microcutting rooting were species specific.

Taxon
landscape treest0
Outcome
Regenerative leaf growth of mother plants and the rooting of their microcuttings was species-specifice0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Regenerative leaf growth of mother plants and the rooting of their microcuttings was species-specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“landscape trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑