Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Plant Research

Effect of Intercropping Castor with Maize and Beans on Growth, Yield and Seed Oil Content

Charles Obiero; Rhoda Birech; J. Malinga; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In Kenya, smallholder farmers have been observed growing castor with maize and beans under an intercropping system amidst little knowledge that such a system could have on the performance of these crops. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of intercropping castor with maize and beans on growth, yield and seed oil content. A 3 × 3 × 2 factorial experiment in randomized complete block design with three levels of crops, three levels of cropping system and two levels of spacing was laid-out at Egerton University farm for three seasons in 2010 to 2012. Results at P =.0001 level of significance indicated high seed yield for castor monocrops in the range of 2.0 - 3.0 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1; while an intercrop of castor at (1.5 m × 1.0 m) with beans at (0.5 m × 0.2 m) spacing showed best cropping mixtures recording yields ranging from 2.15 - 2.43 and 0.3 - 0.83 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1 for castor and beans respectively. In contrast, castor-maize intercrop recorded low maize grain yield ranging from 0.0 – 0.25 tons ha-1 yr-1. Furthermore, castor-beans intercrop had high MAI, IA (962.27) values with LER of 2.34; compared to castor-maize intercrop which recorded negative and low MAI, IA (15.99 – 19.23) and LER (0.98) values. Moreover, intercropping had no significant effect on the seed oil content of castor. It was concluded that castor could be intercropped productively with beans without affecting food crop production and the resultant seed oil content of castor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor monocrops yielded 2.0 - 3.0 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1.

Material
castor monocropse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
2.0 - 3.0 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high seed yield for castor monocrops in the range of 2.0 - 3.0 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The castor-bean intercrop yielded 2.15 - 2.43 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1 for castor.

Treatment
intercrop of castor at (1.5 m × 1.0 m) with beans at (0.5 m × 0.2 m) spacinge0
Interactor
beanse0other
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
beste0
Value
2.15 - 2.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an intercrop of castor at (1.5 m × 1.0 m) with beans at (0.5 m × 0.2 m) spacing showed best cropping mixtures recording yields ranging from 2.15 - 2.43 and 0.3 - 0.83 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1 for castor and beans respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The castor-bean intercrop yielded 0.3 - 0.83 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1 for beans.

Taxon
beanse0
Treatment
intercrop of castor at (1.5 m × 1.0 m) with beans at (0.5 m × 0.2 m) spacinge0
Interactor
castorRicinus communise0other
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
beste0
Value
0.3 - 0.83 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · InteractorDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an intercrop of castor at (1.5 m × 1.0 m) with beans at (0.5 m × 0.2 m) spacing showed best cropping mixtures recording yields ranging from 2.15 - 2.43 and 0.3 - 0.83 tons seeds ha-1 yr-1 for castor and beans respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor-maize intercropping gave low maize grain yield of 0.0 – 0.25 tons ha-1 yr-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
castor-maize intercrope0
Interactor
castorRicinus communise0other
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.0 – 0.25 tons ha-1 yr-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · InteractorDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor-maize intercrop recorded low maize grain yield ranging from 0.0 – 0.25 tons ha-1 yr-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor-bean intercropping gave high MAI and IA (962.27).

Interactor
beanse0other
Outcome
MAI, IAe0
Direction
highe0
Value
962.27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor-beans intercrop had high MAI, IA (962.27) values with LER of 2.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor-bean intercropping had LER 2.34.

Interactor
beanse0other
Outcome
LERe0
Value
2.34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor-beans intercrop had high MAI, IA (962.27) values with LER of 2.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor-maize intercropping had negative and low MAI and IA values of 15.99 – 19.23.

Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
MAI, IAe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
15.99 – 19.23e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor-maize intercrop which recorded negative and low MAI, IA (15.99 – 19.23) and LER (0.98) values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor-maize intercropping had LER 0.98.

Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
LERe0
Value
0.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor-maize intercrop which recorded negative and low MAI, IA (15.99 – 19.23) and LER (0.98) values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had no significant effect on castor seed oil content.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
seed oil contente0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping had no significant effect on the seed oil content of castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1333 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded castor could be productively intercropped with beans without affecting food crop output or castor seed oil.

Interactor
beanse0other
Outcome
intercropped productively with beans without affecting food crop production and the resultant seed oil content of castore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor could be intercropped productively with beans without affecting food crop production and the resultant seed oil content of castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1493 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

intercropping · quality: oil · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.