density · Yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)
38 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 18
Effects of Plant Population on Castorbean Yield1 · 1970
- positive
Effect of Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Castor (Ricinus communis Linn) · 1977
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Intercropping Castor with Maize and Beans on Growth, Yield and Seed Oil Content · 2013
- positive
Response of Wider Spaced Drip Irrigated Rabi Castor to Intra-Row Spacing under Varying N Levels · 2013
- positive
- positive
Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil · 2016
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of plant geometry on castor under conserved moisture condition at Ratia (Ghed), Gujarat · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
POTENTIAL AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS FOR SEMIARID REGIONS · 2021
- positive
- positive
Plant Density Differentially Influences Seed Weightin Different Portions of the Raceme of Castor · 2023
- positive
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
Response of castor (GCH 10) to spacing and nitrogen under irrigated condition · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
Effects of Spacing and Nitrogen on Castor (GAC 11) Grown in Heavy Black Soil · 2025
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.