- Vigna radiata var. radiataPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Vigna radiataPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- flubendiamidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Sesamum indicumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- SorghumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Vigna unguiculataPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Arachis hypogaeaResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pendimethalinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cyamopsis tetragonolobaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Glycine maxResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorantraniliproleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Vigna mungoResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quizalofop-P-ethylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spinosadResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cenchrus americanusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- DiclosulamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Eleusine coracanaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Halosulfuron-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- PongamiaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- alachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorimuron-ethylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- indoxacarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results43 papers: 40 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- sowing timePositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nanoparticlePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ipmResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- storageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.