Paper · 2000 · 中国粮油学报

The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation

AllaouaAchouri; LiJizhang

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This article deals with radiation sensitivity and lethal dose on the main cereal insects such as:Oryzaephilus Surinamensis Linnaeus(OSL),Sitophilus Oryzae Linnaeus(SOL),Rhizopertha Dominica Fabricius(RDF)and Tribolium Castaneum Herbst(TCH)in China.The experiments showed that there was a difference in radiation sensitivity.Among four insects species,OSL had the least tolerance;the second was RDF;the next was SOL and TCH had the biggest tolerance.After radiation with 0,15KGY-0.3KGY all OSL were dead in 2 weeks,all SOL and RDF dead in 3 weeks and all TCH dead in 4 weeks.All eggs could not be incubated with 0.1KGY radiation dose and adults insects had no bearing ability with 0.1 KGY radiation.There was no negative effect on germination potential and germination percentage of wheat with less than 1.0 KGY radiation.The article deals with bioeffect and lethal dose on OSL,SOL,RDF and TCH by ^60Co gamma ray radiation and with wheat germination potential and germination percentage.The economical and reasonable conditions are found for the development of science and technology and to provide the basis for the commercial operation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After radiation with 0.15-0.3 kGy, all Oryzaephilus surinamensis (OSL) adults in stored wheat were dead within 2 weeks.

Treatment
radiation with 0,15KGY-0.3KGYe1
Interactor
OSLe1pest
Outcome
OSL were deade1
Qualifier
in 2 weekse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“After radiation with 0,15KGY-0.3KGY all OSL were dead in 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After gamma irradiation, all SOL and RDF insects in stored wheat were dead within 3 weeks.

Treatment
Gamma Irradiationt0
Interactor
SOLe2pest
Second interactor
RDFe2pest
Outcome
SOL and RDF deade2
Qualifier
in 3 weekse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“all SOL and RDF dead in 3 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After gamma irradiation, all TCH insects in stored wheat were dead within 4 weeks.

Treatment
Gamma Irradiationt0
Interactor
TCHe3pest
Outcome
TCH deade3
Qualifier
in 4 weekse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“all TCH dead in 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eggs of the stored-grain insects could not be incubated after 0.1 kGy radiation.

Treatment
0.1KGY radiation dosee4
Outcome
could not be incubatede4
Qualifier
All eggse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“All eggs could not be incubated with 0.1KGY radiation dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult stored-grain insects had no bearing ability after 0.1 kGy radiation.

Treatment
0.1 KGY radiatione5
Outcome
no bearing abilitye5
Qualifier
adults insectse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“adults insects had no bearing ability with 0.1 KGY radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation below 1.0 kGy had no negative effect on wheat germination potential or germination percentage.

Treatment
less than 1.0 KGY radiatione6
Outcome
germination potential and germination percentagee6
Direction
no negative effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“There was no negative effect on germination potential and germination percentage of wheat with less than 1.0 KGY radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among four stored-grain insect species, OSL had the least radiation tolerance.

Interactor
OSLe7pest
Outcome
least tolerancee7
Qualifier
Among four insects speciese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among four insects species,OSL had the least tolerance;the second was RDF;the next was SOL and TCH had the biggest tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–448 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the four insect species, SOL and TCH had the greatest radiation tolerance, with RDF second least tolerant.

Interactor
SOLe7pest
Second interactor
TCHe7pest
Outcome
biggest tolerancee7
Qualifier
the second was RDFe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The Prevention and Elimination of Insects in Storage of wheat Grains by Gamma Irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among four insects species,OSL had the least tolerance;the second was RDF;the next was SOL and TCH had the biggest tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–448 · show in text ↑

radiation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

radiation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 35 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.