Paper · 2011 · Journal of Crop and Weed

Bio-efficacy of herbicides against complex weed flora in wheat and their residual effects on succeeding crops.

Anil Khokhar; A. S. Charak

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Isoproturon, clodinafop and sulfosulfuron alone at 750 g ha-, 60 g hd and 30 g harespectively and tank mixture ofisoproturon at 500 g ha+ 2, 4-D at 500 g ha-, isoproturon at 500 g ha+ clodinafop at 30 g ha' and isoproturon at 500 g ha' + sulfosulfuron at 15 g hawere evaluated against mixed weed flora in wheat. Tank mix application of isoproturon at 500 g ha+ sulfosu{furon 15 g ha· was highly effective against both grassy and broad/ea/ weeds Phalaris minor, Chenopodium album, C. murale, Melilotus indica, Fumeria perviflora and Coronopus didymus. While clodinafop alone and as a tank mixture with isoproturon effectively controlled grassy weeds only, the tank mix application of isoproturon at 500 g ha'1 + 2, 4-D at 500 g ha·1 was effective against broad/ea/ weeds only. The broad leaf weeds being dominant in the experimental field, the overall weed density and dry matter production recorded at different stages of crop growth was minimum in isoproturon at 500 g ha+ sulfosulfuron at 15 g ha· followed by isoproturon at 500 g ha+ 2, 4-D at 500 g ha-• The tank mix application °f isoproturon at 500 g ha+ su!fosu/foron at 15 g harecorded grain yield (58.0 q ha-) similar to tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g ha+ 2, 4-D at 500 g ha(55.34 q ha-) but significantly higher over other herbicidal treatments with an increase of 70 % over weedy check (34.10 q ha-). None of the herbicides alone or in mixture showed residual effect on germination, plant height and dry matter of succeeding crops of green gram and cucumber. The maize crop in succession was adversely affected due to application of sulfosulfuron at 30 g ha-• Nutrient management with vermicompost at 1.5 I haand 3.0 t haalong with 75% and 50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) respectively and 100% RDF alone had no significant effect on grassy, broad/ea/ as well as total weed density. However, weed biomass and grain yield increased significantly with the application of vermicompos t over 100 % RDF alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mix application of isoproturon at 500 g ha with sulfosulfuron was highly effective against grassy and broadleaf weeds in wheat.

Treatment
Tank mix application of isoproturone0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
grassy and broad/ea/ weedse1
Direction
highly effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tank mix application of isoproturon at 500 g ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“was highly effective against both grassy and broad/ea/ weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop alone effectively controlled grassy weeds in wheat.

Treatment
clodinafop alonee2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
grassy weedse2
Direction
effectively controllede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“clodinafop alone and as a tank mixture with isoproturon effectively controlled grassy weeds only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall weed density and dry matter production were minimum with isoproturon plus sulfosulfuron.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g hae6
Outcome
overall weed density and dry matter productione6
Direction
minimume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e6

“the overall weed density and dry matter production recorded at different stages of crop growth was minimum in isoproturon at 500 g ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixture of isoproturon with sulfosulfuron gave grain yield of 58.0 q/ha, significantly higher than other herbicidal treatments.

Treatment
tank mixture of isoproturone7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
58.0 q ha-e7
Comparator
other herbicidal treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e7

“recorded grain yield (58.0 q ha-) similar to tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1219 · show in text ↑
e2

“but significantly higher over other herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide tank mixtures increased grain yield by 70% over the weedy check.

Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
increasee2
Value
70 %e2
Comparator
weedy checke2

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e7

“recorded grain yield (58.0 q ha-) similar to tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1219 · show in text ↑
e2

“with an increase of 70 % over weedy check (34.10 q ha-)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide alone or in mixture had residual effect on germination, plant height or dry matter of succeeding green gram and cucumber.

Treatment
herbicides alone or in mixturee1
Outcome
germination, plant height and dry mattere1
Direction
showed residual effecte1
Qualifier
succeeding crops of green gram and cucumbere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“None of the herbicides alone or in mixture showed residual effect on germination, plant height and dry matter of succeeding crops of green gram and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 30 g/ha adversely affected the succeeding maize crop.

Treatment
application of sulfosulfuron at 30 g hae1
Outcome
maize crope1
Direction
adversely affectede1
Qualifier
in successione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maize crop in succession was adversely affected due to application of sulfosulfuron at 30 g ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with 75% and 50% RDF had no significant effect on total weed density compared with 100% RDF alone.

Treatment
vermicompos te2
Outcome
total weed densitye1
Direction
no significant effecte1
Comparator
100% RDF alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% RDF alone had no significant effect on grassy, broad/ea/ as well as total weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1856 · show in text ↑
e2

“weed biomass and grain yield increased significantly with the application of vermicompos t over 100 % RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased weed biomass over 100% RDF alone.

Treatment
vermicompos te1
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
increased significantlye1
Comparator
100 % RDF alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed biomass and grain yield increased significantly with the application of vermicompos t over 100 % RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased grain yield over 100% RDF alone.

Treatment
vermicompos te1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increased significantlye1
Comparator
100 % RDF alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed biomass and grain yield increased significantly with the application of vermicompos t over 100 % RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1978 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.