Paper · 2009

Effect of packaging with different LDPE films on storage performance of spinach at low temperature

Ge LinMei; Mao Jin-lin; Hangjun Chen; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Spinach were packaged with different thickness of polyethylene films(0.010,0.025,0.040 and 0.025 mm + anti-condensation component,with no film packaging as control) and stored at(2±0.5)℃.The physiological and biochemical changes in spinach during low temperature storage were studied.The results indicated that spinach packaging with 0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component film could maintain the best quality.It not only reduced the respiration rate,MDA content,and cell membrane permeability,but also kept the level of chlorophyll content and protein content in spinach,which resulting in prolong of the storage period and shelf life.However,there was no clear difference in water loss rate in spinach among packaging with different thickness of films.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.025 mm anti-condensation film maintained the best spinach quality.

Treatment
0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component filme0
Outcome
best qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach packaging with 0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component film could maintain the best quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That film reduced spinach respiration rate, MDA content and cell membrane permeability.

Treatment
0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component filme1
Outcome
respiration rate,MDA content,and cell membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It not only reduced the respiration rate,MDA content,and cell membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach packaging with 0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component film could maintain the best quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That film kept spinach chlorophyll and protein content levels.

Treatment
0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component filme1
Outcome
chlorophyll content and protein contente0
Direction
kepte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kept the level of chlorophyll content and protein content in spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach packaging with 0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component film could maintain the best quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That film prolonged spinach storage period and shelf life.

Treatment
0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component filme1
Outcome
storage period and shelf lifee0
Direction
prolonge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prolong of the storage period and shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–634 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach packaging with 0.025 mm+ anti-condensation component film could maintain the best quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water loss rate showed no clear difference across film thicknesses.

Treatment
packaging with different thickness of filmse0
Outcome
water loss ratee0
Direction
no clear differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no clear difference in water loss rate in spinach among packaging with different thickness of films”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–752 · show in text ↑

storage · physiology: water · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.