Abstract
An experiment was conducted at two locations in Georgia and two locations in North Carolina during 1994 and 1995 to evaluate weed management in conventional-tillage bromoxynil-resistant Gossypium hirsutum L. (cotton). The weed management systems evaluated included different combinations of fluometuron preemergence (PRE), bromoxynil or bromoxynil plus MSMA early postemergence (EPOST), bromoxynil postemergence (POST), and cyanazine plus MSMA late post-directed (LAYBY). Fluometuron PRE improved control of Acanthospermum hisptdium DC. (bristly starbur), Cassia occidentalis L. (coffee senna), Chenopodium album L. (common lambsquarters), Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC. (Florida beggarweed), Sida spinosa L. (prickly sida), Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb. (smallflower morningglory), and Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. (spurred anoda), compared to system that did not use fluometuron PRE. It also improved G. hirsutum yields at three four locations. Bromoxynil-containing systems provided better weed control and higher G. hirsutum yields than systems without bromoxynil. Bromoxynil EPOST controlled A. hispidium, C. occidentalis, C. album, D. tortuosum, S. spinosa, J. tamnifolia , and A. cristata. Control of these species was frequently improved by a second application of bromoxynil POST. Bromoxynil EPOST, POST, or EPOST plus POST did not control Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby (sicklepod), but the addition of MSMA to bromoxynil EPOST improved S. obtusifolia control. Control of all dicotyledonous weeds was improved by a LAYBY treatment of cyanazine plus MSMA, and yields were improved at three of four locations with this treatment. Gossypium hirsutum was not injured by POST treatments of bromoxynil, and only temporary injury resulted from POST treatments of MSMA.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Fluometuron PRE improved control of seven named weeds.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Fluometuron PREe0
- Interactor
- Acanthospermum hisptdiume0weed
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- system that did not use fluometuron PREe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fluometuron PRE improved control of Acanthospermum hisptdium DC. (bristly starbur), Cassia occidentalis L. (coffee senna), Chenopodium album L. (common lambsquarters), Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC. (Florida beggarweed), Sida spinosa L. (prickly sida), Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb. (smallflower morningglory), and Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. (spurred anoda), compared to system that did not use fluometuron PRE.”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluometuron PRE improved cotton yield at three locations.
- Taxon
- G. hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Fluometuron PREt0
- Outcome
- G. hirsutum yieldse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- three four locationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It also improved G. hirsutum yields at three four locations.”
t0“Fluometuron PRE”
Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil systems improved weed control.
- Taxon
- G. hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Bromoxynil-containing systemse0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- systems without bromoxynile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Bromoxynil-containing systems provided better weed control and higher G. hirsutum yields than systems without bromoxynil.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil systems increased cotton yield.
- Taxon
- G. hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Bromoxynil-containing systemse0
- Outcome
- G. hirsutum yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- systems without bromoxynile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Bromoxynil-containing systems provided better weed control and higher G. hirsutum yields than systems without bromoxynil.”
Claim · model-written summary
A second bromoxynil POST application often improved weed control.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- second application of bromoxynil POSTe0
- Outcome
- Control of these speciese0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Control of these species was frequently improved by a second application of bromoxynil POST.”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil did not control sicklepod.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Bromoxynil EPOST, POST, or EPOST plus POSTe0
- Interactor
- Senna obtusifolia
Senna obtusifoliae0weed - Outcome
- control Senna obtusifoliae0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Bromoxynil EPOST, POST, or EPOST plus POST did not control Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby (sicklepod)”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding MSMA improved sicklepod control.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- addition of MSMA to bromoxynil EPOSTe0
- Interactor
- S. obtusifolia
Senna obtusifoliae0weed - Outcome
- S. obtusifolia controle0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the addition of MSMA to bromoxynil EPOST improved S. obtusifolia control”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
Claim · model-written summary
Cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY improved dicot weed control.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- LAYBY treatment of cyanazine plus MSMAe0
- Outcome
- Control of all dicotyledonous weedse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Control of all dicotyledonous weeds was improved by a LAYBY treatment of cyanazine plus MSMA”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
Claim · model-written summary
Cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY improved yield at three of four locations.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- cyanazine plus MSMAt1
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- three of four locationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“yields were improved at three of four locations with this treatment”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
t1“LAYBY treatment of cyanazine plus MSMA”
Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil POST did not injure cotton.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- POST treatments of bromoxynile0
- Outcome
- injurede0
- Direction
- not injurede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Gossypium hirsutum was not injured by POST treatments of bromoxynil”
Claim · model-written summary
MSMA POST caused only temporary cotton injury.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- POST treatments of MSMAe0
- Outcome
- injurye0
- Direction
- temporarye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“only temporary injury resulted from POST treatments of MSMA”
t0“Gossypium hirsutum”
The same questions in other papers
fluometuron · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
cyanazine · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fluometuron · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →cyanazine · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →herbicide · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.