Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Weed Management in Cotton with CGA-362622, Fluometuron, and Pyrithiobac

Ian C. Burke; John W. Wilcut

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at five locations in North Carolina during 2000 and 2001 to evaluate weed control, crop injury, and cotton yield. Weed management systems included different combinations of pyrithiobac preemergence (PRE), fluometuron PRE, CGA-362622 postemergence (POST), pyrithiobac POST, and monosodium salt of methylarsonic acid (MSMA) plus prometryn applied late POST-directed (LAYBY). At Goldsboro in 2000, cotton was injured 74 to 78% by CGA-362622 POST when evaluated 4 to 7 d after treatment (DAT). Injury at Clayton, Goldsboro, and Lewiston in 2001 and Rocky Mount in 2000 was less than 16% 4 to 7 DAT with the same treatment and was not apparent by 62 DAT. CGA-362622 controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and Ipomoea species including entireleaf, ivyleaf, and pitted morningglory, and the addition of pyrithiobac to the herbicide system, either PRE or POST, increased control of Amaranthus species, jimsonweed, and prickly sida. CGA-362622 did not control jimsonweed or prickly sida. Fluometuron PRE, pyrithiobac PRE, and MSMA plus prometryn LAYBY were beneficial for increasing weed control and cotton lint yields. Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY increased control of common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, and smooth pigweed and provided higher cotton yields than similar systems without a LAYBY. The greatest weed control and greatest cotton lint yields required complete weed management systems that included a combination of PRE, POST, and LAYBY treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-362622 caused 74 to 78% cotton injury at Goldsboro shortly after application.

Treatment
CGA-362622 POSTe0
Outcome
cotton was injurede0
Direction
injurede0
Value
74 to 78%e0
Qualifier
4 to 7 d after treatment (DAT)e0
Setting
Goldsboroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Goldsboro in 2000, cotton was injured 74 to 78% by CGA-362622 POST when evaluated 4 to 7 d after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–517 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton injury from the same treatment was below 16% at other sites and disappeared by day 62.

Treatment
same treatmente0
Outcome
Injurye0
Direction
less thane0
Value
16%e0
Qualifier
not apparent by 62 DATe0
Setting
Clayton, Goldsboro, and Lewistone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury at Clayton, Goldsboro, and Lewiston in 2001 and Rocky Mount in 2000 was less than 16% 4 to 7 DAT with the same treatment and was not apparent by 62 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-362622 controlled six named weed groups in cotton.

Treatment
CGA-362622e0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
controllede0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CGA-362622 controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and Ipomoea species including entireleaf, ivyleaf, and pitted morningglory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–856 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding pyrithiobac increased control of Amaranthus species, jimsonweed and prickly sida.

Treatment
addition of pyrithiobace0
Interactor
Amaranthus speciesAmaranthuse0weed
Outcome
control of Amaranthus species, jimsonweed, and prickly sidae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
herbicide systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of pyrithiobac to the herbicide system, either PRE or POST, increased control of Amaranthus species, jimsonweed, and prickly sida.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-362622 did not control jimsonweed or prickly sida.

Treatment
CGA-362622e0
Interactor
jimsonweedDatura stramoniume0weed
Outcome
control jimsonweed or prickly sidae0
Direction
did not controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CGA-362622 did not control jimsonweed or prickly sida.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence fluometuron and pyrithiobac plus late MSMA with prometryn increased weed control and cotton lint yield.

Treatment
Fluometuron PRE, pyrithiobac PRE, and MSMA plus prometryn LAYBYe0
Outcome
weed control and cotton lint yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluometuron PRE, pyrithiobac PRE, and MSMA plus prometryn LAYBY were beneficial for increasing weed control and cotton lint yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late prometryn plus MSMA increased control of five weeds.

Treatment
Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBYe0
Interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
Outcome
control of common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, and smooth pigweede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY increased control of common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, and smooth pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1332 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late prometryn plus MSMA produced higher cotton yield than comparable systems without a late treatment.

Treatment
Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBYe0
Outcome
cotton yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
similar systems without a LAYBYe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY increased control of common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, and smooth pigweed and provided higher cotton yields than similar systems without a LAYBY.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest weed control and cotton lint yield required complete preemergence, postemergence and late herbicide systems.

Outcome
greatest weed control and greatest cotton lint yieldse0
Qualifier
complete weed management systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest weed control and greatest cotton lint yields required complete weed management systems that included a combination of PRE, POST, and LAYBY treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1568 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop injury, and cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑

methylarsonic acid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

prometryn · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fluometuron · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

prometryn · Ambrosia artemisiifolia · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

prometryn · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 7 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 100 positive, 8 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.