Abstract
Plots of pima S-6 cotton were scheduled for irrigation using the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI). Irrigations were applied when CWSI levels reached 0.08 (wet), 0.34 (medium), and 0.68 (dry) units. The medium treatment had significantly higher lint yield. Preliminary test results indicate the CWSI can be useful in irrigation-management decisions regarding pima cotton production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at a CWSI of 0.34 (medium) gave significantly higher lint yield in pima S-6 cotton.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Material
- pima S-6e0
- Treatment
- 0.34 (medium)e1
- Outcome
- lint yielde2
- Direction
- significantly highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plots of pima S-6 cotton were scheduled for irrigation using the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI)”
e1“Irrigations were applied when CWSI levels reached 0.08 (wet), 0.34 (medium), and 0.68 (dry) units”
e2“The medium treatment had significantly higher lint yield”
Claim · model-written summary
CWSI can be useful for irrigation-management decisions in pima cotton production.
Verbatim
e3“Preliminary test results indicate the CWSI can be useful in irrigation-management decisions regarding pima cotton production”
The same questions in other papers
in vitro · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.