Paper · 2004 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Yield and Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce as Affected by Field Moisture at Harvest

Jorge M. Fonseca

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of moisture conditions on microbial quality (as total aerobic bacteria) and yield of head lettuce was investigated. Head lettuce cv. Honcho II grown at the Yuma Agricultural Center was evaluated for microbial population at harvest and postharvest quality either following different irrigation termination schedules or after a rainfall event. The last irrigation was scheduled 24, 16 and 6 days prior to harvest resulting in soil’s water content of 15.9%, 17.0% and 17.2%, respectively, at harvest. Lettuce receiving the last irrigation 6 days before harvest had 10% more weight, higher total aerobic bacteria and shorter shelf life than plants irrigated 24 days before harvest. The plants with the last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harvest showed similar weight at harvest, lower total aerobic count and longer shelf life than plants with irrigation termination scheduled 6 days prior to harvest. The effect of field’s moisture prior to harvest on quality was further evaluated with lettuce harvested 1 and 7 days after a rainfall event. A day after rain the microbial population in both outer leaves and head leaves increased. The microbial population in head leaves continued increasing during the week after rain. The results from this study suggest that managing moisture conditions at harvest is important to enhance quality of lettuce. Although the potential decrease in weight produced with an early irrigation termination is a great concern of growers, it was shown in this study that excessively late pre-harvest irrigation of lettuce is not necessary to obtain maximum weight at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation 6 days before harvest gave 10% more lettuce weight than irrigation 24 days before harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
cv. Honcho IIe0
Treatment
last irrigation 6 days before harveste1
Outcome
weighte1
Direction
moree1
Value
10%e1
Comparator
irrigated 24 days before harveste1
Setting
Yuma Agricultural Centere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Head lettuce cv. Honcho II grown at the Yuma Agricultural Center was evaluated for microbial population at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lettuce receiving the last irrigation 6 days before harvest had 10% more weight, higher total aerobic bacteria and shorter shelf life than plants irrigated 24 days before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation 6 days before harvest gave higher total aerobic bacteria than irrigation 24 days before harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
cv. Honcho IIe0
Treatment
last irrigation 6 days before harveste1
Outcome
total aerobic bacteriae1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
irrigated 24 days before harveste1
Setting
Yuma Agricultural Centere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Head lettuce cv. Honcho II grown at the Yuma Agricultural Center was evaluated for microbial population at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lettuce receiving the last irrigation 6 days before harvest had 10% more weight, higher total aerobic bacteria and shorter shelf life than plants irrigated 24 days before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation 6 days before harvest gave shorter shelf life than irrigation 24 days before harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
cv. Honcho IIe0
Treatment
last irrigation 6 days before harveste1
Outcome
shelf lifee1
Direction
shortere1
Comparator
irrigated 24 days before harveste1
Setting
Yuma Agricultural Centere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Head lettuce cv. Honcho II grown at the Yuma Agricultural Center was evaluated for microbial population at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lettuce receiving the last irrigation 6 days before harvest had 10% more weight, higher total aerobic bacteria and shorter shelf life than plants irrigated 24 days before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation 16 days before harvest gave similar lettuce weight at harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harveste2
Outcome
weight at harveste2
Direction
similare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants with the last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harvest showed similar weight at harvest, lower total aerobic count and longer shelf life than plants with irrigation termination scheduled 6 days prior to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation 16 days before harvest gave lower total aerobic count than irrigation 6 days before harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harveste2
Outcome
total aerobic counte2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
irrigation termination scheduled 6 days prior to harveste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants with the last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harvest showed similar weight at harvest, lower total aerobic count and longer shelf life than plants with irrigation termination scheduled 6 days prior to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation 16 days before harvest gave longer shelf life than irrigation 6 days before harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harveste2
Outcome
shelf lifee2
Direction
longere2
Comparator
irrigation termination scheduled 6 days prior to harveste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants with the last irrigation scheduled 16 days before harvest showed similar weight at harvest, lower total aerobic count and longer shelf life than plants with irrigation termination scheduled 6 days prior to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A day after rain, microbial population increased in outer leaves and head leaves of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
outer leaves and head leavese3
Treatment
A day after raine3
Outcome
microbial populatione3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“A day after rain the microbial population in both outer leaves and head leaves increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial population in head leaves kept increasing during the week after rain.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
head leavese4
Treatment
week after raine4
Outcome
microbial population in head leavese4
Direction
increasinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e4

“The microbial population in head leaves continued increasing during the week after rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1233 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Managing moisture conditions at harvest is important to enhance lettuce quality.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
managing moisture conditions at harveste5
Outcome
quality of lettucee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Microbial Quality of Head Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–43 · show in text ↑
e5

“managing moisture conditions at harvest is important to enhance quality of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1358 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Excessively late pre-harvest irrigation of lettuce is not necessary to obtain maximum weight at harvest.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae6
Treatment
excessively late pre-harvest irrigatione6
Outcome
maximum weighte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“excessively late pre-harvest irrigation of lettuce is not necessary to obtain maximum weight at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1614 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 32 positive, 13 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

irrigation · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 32 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

rainfall · soil: biology · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.