Abstract
Effective microorganisms (EM) have an effect on soil, seed and plant metabolism. Its effect is more effective in soils rich in nutrients and organic matter than in poor ones. Soil received limestone and Fosmag (P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, B and Zn). The treatments were in 3 x 4m-plots in the midst of a bean plantation. Treatments were: 1) Diatom (petrified, grounded algae); 2) EM to seeds; 3) Biosol; 4) Cofermol (Co+Fe+Mo); 5) EM + diatom; 6) EM + MB-4 (rock meal); 7) Control, 8) MB-4. After the emergence of bean plants in 3 and 5 weeks, EM foliar application (0,1%) and Mo (0,04%) were made. Being a very rainy season, many farmers lost their yield in spite of frequent pesticide applications due to fungi diseases like anthracnose. Our beans were attacked by anthracnose and 1,5% grains were mottled. The best treatments were: (2) EM application to seeds (1620 g/plot); (6) EM + MB-4 with 1783 g/plot and (7) the test plot only with foliar EM + Mo application having 1925 g/plot. Experiments show that Mo increases the number of pods per plant and the number of grains per pod whilst EM increases grain weight (1000 grains = 300g to 380g and 1 liter from 844 to 920 g). This means that EM increases grain quality because proteins are heavier than amide. Introduction In previous experiments it was concluded that EM acts on soil and its life (Primavesi, 1997) as on plant metabolism (Primavesi, 1996, 97, 98). Its effect is more significant in soils rich in organic matter and nutrients than in poor ones. As new biological and mineral products appear every month it is interesting to know how they work relatively to EM and if there are favorable mixtures with them. The chosen crop was beans because they are not only the basic food of Brazilian people but also because they are greatly infested by pests and diseases. Besides, beans are one of the cultivated grain legumes which receive the highest amount of pesticide applications. One of the biggest aspirations of organic farmers is to maintain beans healthy and productive. The nutrient balance of crops seems one of the main problems, especially in soils cultivated for years, which could become poorer in trace elements which are difficult to control. Several mineral products appeared in the market like FTE (fritted trace elements), Cofermol, Skrill, MB-4 (a stone meal), Diatomea (a ground petrified algae) but especially bacterial products are offered like Biosol, Orgasol, Agroplus, Supermagro and others. The experiment was conducted in the spring which is somewhat cooler than summertime. Materials The experiment was located in the Southern part of the highland, at an altitude of and 700 m in the State of Sao Paulo, South East of Brazil having a tropical climate. The Methods soil was an Ultisol (red yellow podsolic). It was conducted from September to December as the beans have a 105 day cycle. During this season there is less disease and pest attacks. The characteristics of the soil are given in Table 1. Soil analysis was : (extractor DPTA for B, it was used water) Table 1. Chemical Constituents of the Soil PH CaC12 OM G/dm P resine H+A1 mmo/ dm K mmo/ dm Ca mmo/ dm Mg mmo/ dm B mg/ kg Cu mg/ kg Fe mg/ kg Mn mg/ kg Zn mg/ kg 60 17 13 13 14 29 11 0.16 0.9 13 12 27 The rainfall during the two years were variable (Table 2). This variation is attributed to the large scale deforestation in Brazil causing unpredictable rainfall patterns. The temperature was suitable being about 12° to 17°C at night and 20° – 25°C by day. Due to deforestation however, the day and night temperature differences have become bigger. Table 2. Rainfall (mm) During the Experimental Period Year September October November December 1997 1998 50 189 54 201 230 12 109 89 As the variety Carioquinha needs a nearly neutral pH (6.0 to 6.5) and a high level of calcium, the field received 1.000kg/ha limestone (33% CaO and 16%MgO) and 250kg/ha Fosmag (P2 05 18%, CaO 13%, MgO 2.9%, ZnO 0.5%, S 10% and B 0.1%). The following treatments were made on plots of 3 x 4m with 3 repelications. 1) Diatomea 5) EM + Diatomea 2) EM to the seeds 6) EM + MB-4 3) Biosol to the soil 7) Control 4) Cofermol to the seeds 8) MB-4 to the soil Three and five weeks after emergence EM (0.1%) and Mo (0.04%) were sprayed over the leaves. Two strips of 10 x 30m were used on the two sides of the experimental block with the same fertilizer. Beans were planted in these strips. One strip remained without any foliar application. The second received only EM, the third (on the other side) received only Mo and the fourth, EM+Mo. Samples were collected from the strips at three different places, from five rows 3m long, which corresponded to one experimental plot. Results It was a very rainy season and fungal diseases occurred very frequently. Therefore many farmers lost their yields due to Anthracnosis although they had applied 10 fungicides or more. In our soil, which had been organically treated for more than 15 years, beans had also some Anthracnosis and 15 percent seeds showed brown spots which somewhat lowered the price. But yield was relatively successful (1.620kg/ha) and the general health of crop was astonishing (Table 3A). Table 3. Bean Seed Yields (g/ha) for Different Treatments Treatments Block A Block B Block C Average A. Main Plots 1) Diatomea 2) EM 3) Biosol 4) Cofermol 5) EM+Diatomea 6) EM+MB-4 7) Control 8) MB-4
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Bean anthracnose was observed and 1.5% of grains were mottled.
Verbatim
e0“Our beans were attacked by anthracnose and 1,5% grains were mottled”
Claim · model-written summary
EM seed application yielded 1620 g per plot.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“bean yield”
e0“(2) EM application to seeds (1620 g/plot)”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus MB-4 yielded 1783 g per plot.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“bean yield”
e0“(6) EM + MB-4 with 1783 g/plot”
Claim · model-written summary
The test plot receiving foliar EM and Mo yielded 1925 g per plot.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“bean yield”
e0“(7) the test plot only with foliar EM + Mo application having 1925 g/plot”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo increased pods per plant and grains per pod in beans.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- Moe0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plant and the number of grains per pode0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“bean yield”
e0“Mo increases the number of pods per plant and the number of grains per pod”
Claim · model-written summary
EM increased bean grain weight from 300 to 380 g per 1000 grains.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“bean yield”
e0“EM increases grain weight (1000 grains = 300g to 380g and 1 liter from 844 to 920 g)”
Claim · model-written summary
EM increased the weight of one liter of bean grain from 844 to 920 g.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“bean yield”
e0“EM increases grain weight (1000 grains = 300g to 380g and 1 liter from 844 to 920 g)”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.