Paper · 1990 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

Foliar condensed tannin levels in lotus species growing on limed and unlimed soils in South-Eastern Australia

W.M. Kelman; G.J. Tanner

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Condensed tannin concentrations (% of dryweight) were measured in leaves of 22 accessions of Lotus corniculatus, 10 accessions of L. pedunculatus, 2 accessions of L. tenuis, and 1 accession of L. subbiflorus from plants growing on limed (pH = 5.2) and unlimed (pH = 4.3) soils near Canberra, A.C.T. There was a non-significant decrease in the mean condensed tannin concentration due to liming. The differences between species and between accessions within species were significant. For the L. corniculatus entries the range of tannin concentrations over the limed and unlimed sites was 0.15-7.28%, with a mean of 2.09%. The highest concentration was found in the otherwise promising accession CPI 66414. L. pedunculatus accessions ranged from 2.53-10.72% in tannin content, with a mean of 5.99%. Two Portuguese accessions that have promising agronomic features for coastal east Australian pastures had unacceptably high tannin levels above 7.50%. Genotypic differences accounted for a large proportion of the total variability for tannin production, so there are good prospects for the improvement of these species by selection and breeding. Keywords: Lotus corniculatus, L. pedunculatus, L. tenuis, L. subbiflorus, condensed tannins

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming gave a nonsignificant decrease in mean condensed tannin.

Taxon
lotus speciesLotust0
Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
mean condensed tannin concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a non-significant decrease in the mean condensed tannin concentration due to liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“lotus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tannin concentrations differed significantly between species.

Taxon
lotus speciesLotust0
Material
speciese0
Outcome
differences between speciese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between species and between accessions within species were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“lotus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tannin concentrations differed significantly among accessions within species.

Taxon
lotus speciesLotust0
Material
accessionse0
Outcome
accessions within speciese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between species and between accessions within species were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“lotus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. corniculatus tannin ranged 0.15-7.28%, mean 2.09%.

Taxon
L. corniculatusLotus corniculatuse0
Outcome
tannin concentrationse0
Value
0.15-7.28%e0
Qualifier
mean of 2.09%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus corniculatus
Lotus corniculatus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the L. corniculatus entries the range of tannin concentrations over the limed and unlimed sites was 0.15-7.28%, with a mean of 2.09%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–618 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPI 66414 had the highest tannin concentration.

Taxon
lotus speciesLotust0
Material
CPI 66414e0
Outcome
highest concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration was found in the otherwise promising accession CPI 66414”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“lotus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. pedunculatus tannin ranged 2.53-10.72%, mean 5.99%.

Taxon
L. pedunculatusLotus pedunculatuse0
Outcome
tannin contente0
Value
2.53-10.72%e0
Qualifier
mean of 5.99%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. pedunculatus accessions ranged from 2.53-10.72% in tannin content, with a mean of 5.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Portuguese accessions had tannin above 7.50%.

Taxon
lotus speciesLotust0
Material
Portuguese accessionse0
Outcome
tannin levelse0
Direction
unacceptably highe0
Value
above 7.50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Portuguese accessions that have promising agronomic features for coastal east Australian pastures had unacceptably high tannin levels above 7.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“lotus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype explained a large share of variability in tannin production.

Taxon
lotus speciesLotust0
Material
Genotypic differencese0
Outcome
total variability for tannin productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypic differences accounted for a large proportion of the total variability for tannin production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“lotus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑