Paper · 2002 · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)

Harvest aid combination and application timing effects on lint yield and fiber quality

Mark S. Kelley

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Since the advent of harvest aids, upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) producers in the Texas High Plains have benefitted from early crop termination and timely harvesting. Cotton produced on the Texas High Plains can typically be characterized as non-rank, irrigated, short-season stripper-harvested types. Leaving a crop in the field until a freeze can reduce lint yields and quality due to inclement weather skuations. These losses can often be reduced when harvest aids are utilized. The objectives of this research were to determine how early a crop could be terminated without adversely affecting lint production and quality. Replicated field experiments were conducted at 3 locations (1 in 1998 and 2 in 1999). Treatments consisted of (1) ethephon [(2-Chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] + tributes (S,S,S-Tributyl phosphorotrithioate), (2) thidiazuron/diuron [N-phenyl-N'-l ,2,3-thidiazol-5-ylurea/3-(3,4- ichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] alone and (3) ethephon + thidiazuron/diuron. These were all applied at 0-10, 30 and 60% open boll (OB) and terminated with paraquat (1,1' -dimethyl 4,4' -bipyridinium dichloride) at 7 to 14 days after 60% OB applications. In addition, two untreated controls (one terminated with paraquat and one left to freeze) were evaluated. Data from these studies indicate that yield can be adversely affected by early applications of harvest aids. Yield results from the 3 locations indicate chemical treatment regime had no significant effect on bur cotton, lint and seed yields. However, application timing had a significant effect on yields. Extremely early (0-10% OB) applications of harvest aids significantly reduced yields. The 30% OB application timings at Halfway and Petersburg, however, had no effect on yield then compared to the 60% OB application timings. This is due in part to the crop and environmental conditions at time of application. Certain HVI fiber properties may also be adversely affected by early harvest aid applications, including reductions in micronaire values. Micronaire values were reduced by the 0-10% OB applications at Olton and Petersburg. Chemical treatment regime, however, did not significantly impact micronaire at any location. Although lint quality may be influenced by application timing of harvest aids, those influences may not affect final lint value. The use of ethephon may reduce APIS measurements of fineness and fiber maturity values while in turn increasing immature fiber content (IPC) as was observed at Halfway in 1999. Application timing also had an impact on APIS measurements of fineness, IPC, and maturity ratio. The results from APIS measurements helped explain the reductions in micronaire values at Petersburg. In conclusion, producers on the High Plains of Texas would benefit from waking until 60% of harvestable bolls are open before applying harvest aids under normal conditions. Should the need arise to apply harvest aids at earlier timings, 30% OB applications may prevent significant yield and fiber quality losses if detrimental weather, such as an early freeze, is expected. This however may in itself cause yield losses if the condition of the crop is not conducive to harvest aid applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment regime did not significantly affect bur cotton, lint, or seed yields.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
chemical treatment regimee0
Outcome
bur cotton, lint and seed yieldse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical treatment regime had no significant effect on bur cotton, lint and seed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1510 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing significantly affected yields.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
application timinge0
Outcome
yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application timing had a significant effect on yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Very early harvest aid application reduced yields significantly.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Extremely early (0-10% OB) applications of harvest aidse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extremely early (0-10% OB) applications of harvest aids significantly reduced yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Halfway and Petersburg, 30% open-boll application did not change yield relative to 60% application.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
30% OB application timingse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
had no effecte0
Comparator
60% OB application timingse0
Setting
Halfway and Petersburge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 30% OB application timings at Halfway and Petersburg, however, had no effect on yield then compared to the 60% OB application timings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1799 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early harvest aid application reduced micronaire at Olton and Petersburg.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
0-10% OB applicationse0
Outcome
Micronaire valuese0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Olton and Petersburge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronaire values were reduced by the 0-10% OB applications at Olton and Petersburg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2024–2107 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment regime did not significantly affect micronaire at any location.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Chemical treatment regimee0
Outcome
micronairee0
Direction
did not significantly impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical treatment regime, however, did not significantly impact micronaire at any location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2109–2200 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon may reduce APIS fineness measurements.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
APIS measurements of finenesse0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of ethephon may reduce APIS measurements of fineness and fiber maturity values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2331–2417 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon may reduce fiber maturity values.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
fiber maturity valuese0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of ethephon may reduce APIS measurements of fineness and fiber maturity values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2331–2417 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon may increase immature fiber content at Halfway in 1999.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
immature fiber content (IPC)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
Halfway in 1999e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of ethephon may reduce APIS measurements of fineness and fiber maturity values while in turn increasing immature fiber content (IPC) as was observed at Halfway in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2331–2506 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing affected APIS fineness, IPC, and maturity ratio.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Application timinge0
Outcome
APIS measurements of fineness, IPC, and maturity ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application timing also had an impact on APIS measurements of fineness, IPC, and maturity ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2508–2603 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APIS measurements helped explain reduced micronaire at Petersburg.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Outcome
reductions in micronaire valuese0
Qualifier
APIS measurementse0
Setting
Petersburge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results from APIS measurements helped explain the reductions in micronaire values at Petersburg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2605–2704 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High Plains producers would benefit from waiting until 60% of harvestable bolls open before using harvest aids.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Outcome
until 60% of harvestable bolls are open before applying harvest aidse0
Qualifier
under normal conditionse0
Setting
High Plains of Texase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“producers on the High Plains of Texas would benefit from waking until 60% of harvestable bolls are open before applying harvest aids under normal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2721–2877 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

When an early freeze is expected, 30% open-boll application may avoid major yield and quality losses, depending on crop condition.

Taxon
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Outcome
30% OB applications may prevent significant yield and fiber quality lossese0
Qualifier
if detrimental weather, such as an early freeze, is expectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30% OB applications may prevent significant yield and fiber quality losses if detrimental weather, such as an early freeze, is expected. This however may in itself cause yield losses if the condition of the crop is not conducive to harvest aid applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2943–3199 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.