Abstract
Field trials were conducted in New Jersey during 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the efficacy of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, dicamba, and clopyralid on horsenettle control in field corn. Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively. No treatment was statistically more effective than dicamba. Corn yields were not influenced by the herbicide treatments. Horsenettle populations were not reduced by any treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Primisulfuron + dicamba reduced horsenettle biomass by 74%
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- primisulfuron + dicambae1
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee1weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle biomasse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 74%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e1“Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Primisulfuron reduced horsenettle biomass by 68%
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- primisulfurone1
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee1weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle biomasse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 68%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e1“Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicosulfuron + dicamba reduced horsenettle biomass by 64%
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- nicosulfuron + dicambae1
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee1weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle biomasse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 64%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e1“Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba reduced horsenettle biomass by 61%
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- dicambae1
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee1weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle biomasse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 61%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e1“Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Clopyralid reduced horsenettle biomass by 48%
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- clopyralide1
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee1weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle biomasse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 48%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e1“Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicosulfuron reduced horsenettle biomass by 40%
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- nicosulfurone1
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee1weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle biomasse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 40%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e1“Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
No herbicide treatment was statistically more effective than dicamba against horsenettle
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e2“No treatment was statistically more effective than dicamba”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatments did not influence corn yields
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e3“Corn yields were not influenced by the herbicide treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
No treatment reduced horsenettle populations
- Taxon
- Field Cornt0
- Treatment
- any treatmente4
- Interactor
- Horsenettlee4weed
- Outcome
- Horsenettle populationse4
- Direction
- not reducede4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)”
e4“Horsenettle populations were not reduced by any treatment”
The same questions in other papers
clopyralid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
Primisulfuron · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →dicamba · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →nicosulfuron · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.