Paper · 1991 · PubMed

Induction of Isoperoxidases in Resistant and Susceptible Tomato Cultivars by Meloidogyne incognita.

S Molinari

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Isoperoxidases were detected in resistant Rossol and susceptible Roma VF tomato roots uninfected and infected by Meloidogyne incognita. Syringaldazine, guaiacol, p-phenylenediamine-pyrocatechol (PPD-PC), and indoleacetic acid (IAA) were used as substrates, and the corresponding peroxidative activities were detected either in cytoplasmic or in cell wall fractions, except for IAA oxidase, which was measured in soluble and microsomal fractions. Isoperoxidase activities and cellular locations were induced differently in resistant and susceptible cultivars by nematodes. Nematode infestation markedly enhanced syringaldazine oxidase activity in cell walls of the resistant cultivar. This isoperoxidase is involved in the last step of lignin deposition in plants. Conversely, the susceptible cultivar reacted to M. incognita infection with an increase in cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase activity, which presumedly is involved in ethylene production; no changes in cell wall isoperoxidases were observed. IAA oxidase was inhibited in susceptible plants after nematode inoculation, whereas in resistant plants this activity increased in the soluble fraction and decreased in the microsomal fraction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infestation markedly enhanced syringaldazine oxidase activity in cell walls of the resistant tomato cultivar Rossol.

Material
Rossole0
Organ / stage
cell wallse1
Treatment
Nematode infestatione1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
syringaldazine oxidase activity in cell wallse1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
uninfectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Isoperoxidases were detected in resistant Rossol and susceptible Roma VF tomato roots uninfected and infected by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nematode infestation markedly enhanced syringaldazine oxidase activity in cell walls of the resistant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the susceptible cultivar Roma VF, M. incognita infection increased cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase activity.

Material
Roma VFe0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
M. incognita infectione3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pest
Outcome
cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase activitye3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
uninfectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Isoperoxidases were detected in resistant Rossol and susceptible Roma VF tomato roots uninfected and infected by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“reacted to M. incognita infection with an increase in cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the susceptible cultivar, M. incognita infection did not change cell wall isoperoxidases.

Material
Roma VFe0
Treatment
M. incognita infectione3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pest
Outcome
cell wall isoperoxidasese4
Direction
no changese4
Comparator
uninfectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Isoperoxidases were detected in resistant Rossol and susceptible Roma VF tomato roots uninfected and infected by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“reacted to M. incognita infection with an increase in cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–890 · show in text ↑
e4

“no changes in cell wall isoperoxidases were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In susceptible tomato plants, nematode inoculation inhibited IAA oxidase activity.

Material
susceptible plantse6
Treatment
nematode inoculatione6
Interactor
nematodeNematodae6pest
Outcome
IAA oxidasee6
Direction
inhibitede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“IAA oxidase was inhibited in susceptible plants after nematode inoculation, whereas in resistant plants this activity increased in the soluble fraction and decreased in the microsomal fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In resistant tomato plants, nematode inoculation increased IAA oxidase activity in the soluble fraction.

Material
resistant plantse6
Treatment
nematode inoculatione6
Interactor
nematodeNematodae6pest
Outcome
IAA oxidasee6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
soluble fractione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“IAA oxidase was inhibited in susceptible plants after nematode inoculation, whereas in resistant plants this activity increased in the soluble fraction and decreased in the microsomal fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In resistant tomato plants, nematode inoculation decreased IAA oxidase activity in the microsomal fraction.

Material
resistant plantse6
Treatment
nematode inoculatione6
Interactor
nematodeNematodae6pest
Outcome
IAA oxidasee6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
microsomal fractione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“IAA oxidase was inhibited in susceptible plants after nematode inoculation, whereas in resistant plants this activity increased in the soluble fraction and decreased in the microsomal fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1191 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The isoperoxidase involved is part of the final step of lignin deposition in tomato.

Gene
isoperoxidasee2
Outcome
lignin depositione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“This isoperoxidase is involved in the last step of lignin deposition in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–762 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase is presumed to be involved in ethylene production in infected susceptible tomato.

Gene
PPD-PC oxidasee3
Outcome
ethylene productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“reacted to M. incognita infection with an increase in cytoplasmic PPD-PC oxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–890 · show in text ↑
e5

“which presumedly is involved in ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–943 · show in text ↑

infection · cytology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

infection · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 9 positive, 10 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.