Paper · 2000 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Relationship between the suppression of photosynthesis and starch accumulation in the pod-removed bean

Hiromi Nakano; Shinichi Muramatsu; Amane Makino; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
90
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of pod removal on the photosynthetic rates and their under lying biochemical properties were examined in leaves of bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Pod removal led to decreases in the photosynthetic gas- exchange rate, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 pressure. H owever, these decreases in photosynthesis were not asso-ciated with changes in the amounts of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carb oxylase (Rubisco) and other several photo-synthetic components, but were associated with an increase in starch content. In addition, such a decrease in the photosynthetic rate was not observed when measured with O2 evolution under conditions of saturating CO2. Similarly, although a decrease in CO2-limited photosynthesis for a given Rubisco content was found in depodded plants, neither the speci fic activity nor activation state of Rubisco decreased . The decrease in the photosynthetic gas-exchange rate by pod removal was rec overed by shading the plants. CO2-limited photosynthesis per unit of Rubisco protein was also completely recovered at the same l evel in the plants with pods. At the same time, starch accumu-lation was also decreased by shading. From these results, we concluded that the suppression of photosynthesis observed in depodded beans was caused by the hindrance of CO2 diffusion due to starch accumulated in the chloroplast.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod removal decreased bean gas-exchange photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 pressure.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Pod removale0
Outcome
photosynthetic gas- exchange rate, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 pressuree0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pod removal led to decreases in the photosynthetic gas- exchange rate, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–276 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The photosynthetic decrease was associated with increased starch content.

Taxon
beant0
Compound
starche0
Outcome
decreases in photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasese0

Verbatim

e0

“these decreases in photosynthesis were not asso-ciated with changes in the amounts of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carb oxylase (Rubisco) and other several photo-synthetic components, but were associated with an increase in starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod removal did not change Rubisco and other photosynthetic component amounts.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
amounts of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carb oxylase (Rubisco) and other several photo-synthetic componentse0
Direction
not asso-ciated with changese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“these decreases in photosynthesis were not asso-ciated with changes in the amounts of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carb oxylase (Rubisco) and other several photo-synthetic components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under saturating CO2, pod removal did not decrease photosynthesis measured by O2 evolution.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
not observede0
Qualifier
conditions of saturating CO2e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“such a decrease in the photosynthetic rate was not observed when measured with O2 evolution under conditions of saturating CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Depodded plants showed reduced CO2-limited photosynthesis for a given Rubisco content.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
depoddede0
Outcome
CO2-limited photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
for a given Rubisco contente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in CO2-limited photosynthesis for a given Rubisco content was found in depodded plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubisco specific activity and activation state did not decrease in depodded plants.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
speci fic activity nor activation state of Rubiscoe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“neither the speci fic activity nor activation state of Rubisco decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading restored the gas-exchange photosynthetic rate in depodded plants.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
photosynthetic gas-exchange ratee0
Direction
rec overede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in the photosynthetic gas-exchange rate by pod removal was rec overed by shading the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading restored CO2-limited photosynthesis per Rubisco protein to the level of plants with pods.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
CO2-limited photosynthesis per unit of Rubisco proteine0
Direction
recoverede0
Comparator
plants with podse0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“CO2-limited photosynthesis per unit of Rubisco protein was also completely recovered at the same l evel in the plants with pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased starch accumulation.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
starch accumu-latione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“starch accumu-lation was also decreased by shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“pod-removed bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed photosynthetic suppression in depodded beans to hindered CO2 diffusion from chloroplast starch accumulation.

Taxon
beanse0
Compound
starche0
Outcome
suppression of photosynthesise0
Qualifier
hindrance of CO2 diffusione0

Verbatim

e0

“the suppression of photosynthesis observed in depodded beans was caused by the hindrance of CO2 diffusion due to starch accumulated in the chloroplast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1353 · show in text ↑

shade · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.