Abstract
A study was conducted in fig in order to find out suitable cuttings and IBA concentrationfor propagation of fig in open conditions. Rooting and survival percent, root and shoot parameters like root and shoot length, no. of roots and shoots, number of leaves, fresh and dry weights of root and shoots were best recorded in basal cuttings. Among the IBA concentrations imposed, IBA 3000 ppm recorded highest in above said parameters. Among the interactions between type of cuttings and IBA concentrations, basal cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm recorded in all parameters in including field survival percentage of rooted cuttings. Days to first sprouting was less in apical cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm. The above rootings and shooting parameters and field establishment were least recorded in apical cuttings treated with IBA 1000 ppm. So, basal cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm are best for propagation of fig in open conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Basal cuttings gave the best rooting, survival, root and shoot growth, leaf number and root and shoot weights.
- Taxon
- figt0
- Treatment
- basal cuttingse0
- Outcome
- Rooting and survival percent, root and shoot parameters like root and shoot length, no. of roots and shoots, number of leaves, fresh and dry weights of root and shootse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Rooting and survival percent, root and shoot parameters like root and shoot length, no. of roots and shoots, number of leaves, fresh and dry weights of root and shoots were best recorded in basal cuttings.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 3000 ppm gave the highest rooting and shoot parameters.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Among the IBA concentrations imposed, IBA 3000 ppm recorded highest in above said parameters.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal cuttings with IBA 3000 ppm performed best across measured parameters and field survival.
- Taxon
- figt0
- Treatment
- basal cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppme0
- Outcome
- field survival percentage of rooted cuttingse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“basal cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm recorded in all parameters in including field survival percentage of rooted cuttings.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Apical cuttings with IBA 3000 ppm had fewer days to first sprouting.
- Taxon
- figt0
- Treatment
- apical cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppme0
- Outcome
- Days to first sproutinge0
- Direction
- lesse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Days to first sprouting was less in apical cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Apical cuttings with IBA 1000 ppm had the least rooting, shooting and field establishment.
- Taxon
- figt0
- Treatment
- apical cuttings treated with IBA 1000 ppme0
- Outcome
- rootings and shooting parameters and field establishmente0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The above rootings and shooting parameters and field establishment were least recorded in apical cuttings treated with IBA 1000 ppm.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend basal cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm for open-condition fig propagation.
Verbatim
e0“basal cuttings treated with IBA 3000 ppm are best for propagation of fig in open conditions.”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · quality: postharvest · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
24 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.